ANTHROPIC

Anthropic Price

Closed
ANTHROPIC
$0
+$0(%0,00)
No data

*Data last updated: 2026-04-24 00:36 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-24 00:36, Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) is priced at $0, with a total market cap of --, a P/E ratio of 0,00, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $0 and $0. The current price is %0,00 above the day's low and %0,00 below the day's high, with a trading volume of --. Over the past 52 weeks, ANTHROPIC has traded between $0 to $0, and the current price is %0,00 away from the 52-week high.

ANTHROPIC Key Stats

P/E Ratio0,00
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Shares Outstanding0,00

Learn More about Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)

Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) FAQ

What's the stock price of Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) today?

x
Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) is currently trading at $0, with a 24h change of %0,00. The 52-week trading range is $0–$0.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)?

x

Should you buy or sell Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)?

x

How to buy Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Anthropic (ANTHROPIC) Latest News

2026-04-23 17:11

SBF Claims FTX Assets Worth $114 Billion If Not Liquidated, Anthropic Stake Valued at $82.3 Billion

Gate News message, April 23 — SBF, founder of bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX, claimed in a post on his X account on April 22 that if the exchange's assets had not been liquidated following its November 2022 collapse, they would have been worth approximately $114 billion as of that date. According to SBF, the top six holdings would have comprised: Anthropic ($82.3 billion, representing a 165x return), SpaceX ($15 billion, 75x return), Solana (SOL) ($5.1 billion, 27x return), Robinhood ($4.9 billion, 8x return), Genesis Digital ($3.5 billion, 3x return), and Kursor ($3 billion, 15,000x return). SBF suggested that FTX's liquidators missed out on billions of dollars in potential value by selling the assets early rather than holding them through the market recovery.

2026-04-23 08:33

Anthropic Launches /ultrareview for Claude Code: Multi-Agent Cloud-Based Code Review

Gate News message, April 23 — Anthropic has introduced /ultrareview (research preview), a cloud-based multi-agent code review feature for Claude Code. Users can type /ultrareview in the CLI to launch a group of review agents in a remote sandbox that work in parallel to examine diffs between the current branch and the default branch (including uncommitted changes), or directly review GitHub PRs by providing a PR number. The entire process requires no local resources and typically takes 5 to 10 minutes, with results returned to the session as notifications. The key distinction from the local /review tool lies in its verification mechanism: each finding is independently reproduced and confirmed by a separate agent, focusing on actual bugs rather than code style suggestions. Anthropic positions the two tools for different stages of development—/review for quick feedback during coding, and /ultrareview for deep review of critical changes (such as authentication or data migration) before merging. Regarding pricing, /ultrareview uses extra usage billing and does not consume plan-included usage. Pro and Max users each have 3 free uses before May 5 (one-time, non-renewable), after which each review costs approximately $5 to $20 depending on the scale of changes. Team and Enterprise users have no free allowance. The feature requires Claude.ai account authentication and is unavailable for Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI, Microsoft Foundry, or organizations with zero data retention enabled.

2026-04-23 01:49

FTX Would Hold $114B in Assets If Bankrupt Estate Had Not Sold Anthropic, Solana, SpaceX Stakes

Gate News message, April 23 — If FTX's bankruptcy estate had not sold its stakes in Anthropic, Solana, SpaceX, and other investments, the failed exchange would currently hold approximately $114 billion in assets, according to Cointelegraph. The breakdown includes Anthropic at roughly $82.3 billion (165x return), Solana at $5.1 billion (27x), Robinhood at $4.9 billion (8x), Genesis Digital at $3.5 billion (3x), SpaceX at $15 billion (75x), and Cursor at $3 billion (15,000x return).

2026-04-22 22:12

OpenAI Reaches $1 Trillion Pre-IPO Valuation Amid Race with SpaceX and Anthropic

Gate News message, April 22 — OpenAI has reached an implied $1 trillion pre-IPO valuation, according to on-chain pre-IPO instruments trading on Jupiter backed by SPV exposure. The valuation has surged 163% since October 2025, when speculation about a potential $1 trillion-plus IPO first emerged. SpaceX is reportedly targeting a valuation exceeding $1.7 trillion, while Anthropic is approaching the same $1 trillion milestone. These three companies are now in a high-stakes race to become the next major public listing. OpenAI's path to this valuation reflects the escalating costs of generative AI. A single ChatGPT exchange can cost $0.01 to $0.10, while high-definition image generation ranges from $0.10 to $0.20. With billions of daily requests in 2026, the computational demands are staggering. GPUs—primarily supplied by Nvidia—cost tens of thousands of dollars each, and cloud access runs several dollars per hour per chip. Industry estimates suggest that infrastructure investment could reach hundreds of billions of dollars by the end of the decade. OpenAI originally aimed to build AI "beneficial to humanity" and prevent a few firms from controlling the field. However, mounting costs forced a shift. In 2019, the company adopted a hybrid structure combining foundation control with capital-raising capabilities. ChatGPT's launch in late 2022 accelerated this transformation, reaching 100 million users in two months and 900 million weekly active users by early 2026. Revenue followed suit: from approximately $200 million in 2022 to over $10 billion in 2025—a 60-fold increase. OpenAI's subscription tiers now range from $20 to $200 monthly for consumers, while enterprise plans cost $25 to $60 per user per month. A company with 10,000 employees can therefore generate several million dollars in annual revenue. Meanwhile, Anthropic faced a pricing backlash when Claude Code appeared to vanish from its $20-per-month Pro tier, seemingly requiring a $100-per-month subscription instead. Anthropic later clarified the pricing page change affected only 2% of new sign-ups and that existing users saw no change. During the confusion, Sam Altman and OpenAI staff used the moment to promote Codex, OpenAI's competing coding tool.

2026-04-22 20:02

DeepSeek's Valuation Surges Past $20 Billion as Tencent and Alibaba Weigh Investments

Gate News message, April 22 — DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup owned by hedge fund High-Flyer Capital Management, is now seeking a valuation above $20 billion as Tencent Holdings and Alibaba Group discuss potential investments. The Information reported Wednesday that the asking price has climbed rapidly from at least $10 billion just days earlier (Friday, April 18). The startup is still in talks with investors, and both the valuation and fundraising amount could change. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said Wednesday on the Dwarkesh Podcast that it would be "a horrible outcome" for the United States if DeepSeek optimizes its AI models to run on Huawei chips instead of American hardware. Currently, U.S. chips are about five times more powerful than Chinese rivals, with the gap expected to widen to 17 times by 2027. Huawei's Ascend 910C delivers approximately 60% of the inference performance of Nvidia's H100, which is already two generations behind Nvidia's current flagship. Huang noted that China possesses "abundant energy" and a "large pool of AI researchers," presenting a potential catch-up path in AI development. Meanwhile, AI funding continues to surge globally. Vast Data announced a $1 billion funding round at a $30 billion valuation on Wednesday, with Nvidia among the backers. The financing, led by Drive Capital and Access Industries, more than tripled Vast's $9.1 billion valuation from 2023. According to Dealroom, AI companies worldwide have already raised $280.5 billion this year, with over $170 billion directed to OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI.

Hot Posts About Anthropic (ANTHROPIC)

BlockBeatNews

BlockBeatNews

30 minutes ago
According to Beating Monitoring, the Anthropic engineering team issued a statement confirming that the decline in Claude Code quality feedback from users over the past month originated from three independent product-level changes, while the API and underlying models were unaffected. The three issues were fixed on April 7, 10, and 20, with the final version being v2.1.116. The first change occurred on March 4. To reduce occasional extremely long delays (UI appearing frozen) caused by high inference load on Opus 4.6, the team lowered the default inference strength of Claude Code from high to medium. Users generally reported the system becoming less responsive, so on April 7, the change was rolled back, and now Opus 4.7 defaults to xhigh, while other models default to high. The second issue was a bug introduced on March 26. Originally, the design was to clear old inference records after one hour of session inactivity to save costs when resuming sessions. An implementation flaw caused the clearing to happen not once, but on every subsequent round, gradually causing the model to lose previous inference context, manifesting as increasing forgetfulness, repeated operations, and abnormal tool calls. This bug also caused cache misses on every request, accelerating user quota consumption. The team stated that two unrelated internal experiments masked the reproduction conditions, and troubleshooting took over a week. The bug was fixed on April 10. Afterwards, code review backtests using Opus 4.7 on the problematic PR showed that Opus 4.7 could detect this bug, while Opus 4.6 could not. The third change was deployed with Opus 4.7 on April 16. The team added a length limit instruction to the system prompt: "Text between tool calls should not exceed 25 words, and the final reply should not exceed 100 words unless more details are required." Internal testing for several weeks showed no regression, but after deployment, stacking this with other prompts damaged coding quality, affecting Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.6, and Opus 4.7. Broader evaluation revealed a 3% decline in both Opus 4.6 and 4.7, leading to a rollback on April 20. These three changes affected different user groups and took effect at different times. Their overlapping effects resulted in widespread and inconsistent quality declines, complicating troubleshooting. Anthropic stated that going forward, they will require more internal staff to use the same publicly available build as users, run full model evaluation suites on every system prompt modification, and implement a gray release period. As compensation, Anthropic has reset the usage quotas for all subscribed users.
0
0
0
0
discovery

discovery

2 hours ago
#SpaceXBids$60BforCursor Elon Musk’s 60 Billion Dollar Code Move and Pre IPO Artificial Intelligence Chess The most talked about headline of April 2026 is summarized in one sentence: SpaceX secured an option to acquire AI coding startup Cursor for 60 billion dollars. Even if the acquisition does not happen, there is a 10 billion dollar payment commitment for joint development with Cursor. This is not just an acquisition story. It is the centerpiece of SpaceX’s plan to transform from a rocket company into a space based artificial intelligence giant ahead of its expected public listing in June to July 2026. Here are the 5 critical dimensions behind the #SpaceXBids$60BforCursor tag. 1. What the Deal Says: 60 Billion Dollar Option, 10 Billion Dollar Insurance SpaceX announced on April 22, 2026 that it is working with Cursor to create the world’s best coding and knowledge work AI. The deal gives SpaceX the right to buy Cursor this year for 60 billion dollars. If the purchase does not happen, 10 billion dollars will be paid for joint work. According to Bloomberg, the acquisition is not happening immediately because a deal of this size would require SpaceX to refile its initial public offering documents. The 10 billion dollars is viewed as a breakup fee that activates if the deal is canceled. Cursor was previously discussing a 2 billion dollar funding round at a valuation above 50 billion dollars. That round was shelved. Because the computing power Cursor needed will now be provided by SpaceX. 2. Who Is Cursor: The New Favorite of Code Cursor is a product from San Francisco based Anysphere. Its tool called Composer learns a developer’s style, autocompletes code, reviews it, and edits when needed. It is a direct competitor to Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. The difference is this: Cursor users can switch between different AI models. It was praised by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. It has reached enterprise use in more than half of Fortune 500 companies and has 2 billion dollars in annualized revenue. The problem starts here: Today Cursor pays retail prices to Anthropic and OpenAI. That means every dollar of revenue partially funds its direct competition. SpaceX’s Colossus infrastructure changes that equation. 3. Why SpaceX Wants Cursor: Colossus Plus Distribution Equals Orbital Intelligence SpaceX merged with xAI in February 2026. That brought the Grok chatbot, the X platform, and the rocket business under one roof. Now with the Cursor move, the final link of the chain is added: the application layer. SpaceX has the Colossus supercomputer in Memphis. It has compute equivalent to one million Nvidia H100 chips. When Cursor’s product and access to expert software engineers combine with Colossus, the goal is clear: build the world’s most useful models. Cursor’s missing piece was infrastructure. SpaceX’s missing piece was a fast growing software business with proven enterprise distribution. Cursor gives that to SpaceX. SpaceX gives Cursor the computing power to end dependence on Anthropic and OpenAI. Moreover, SpaceX’s long term vision is bigger: turning Starlink satellites into space based data centers and using solar energy and the cooling advantage of space. Musk calls this Orbital Intelligence. Coding is the fastest way to monetize this infrastructure. 4. Pre IPO Timing: Defending a 1.75 Trillion Dollar Valuation SpaceX is on track for a public listing targeted for the end of June. Talk is of raising 75 billion dollars at a 1.75 trillion dollar valuation. Some sources even mention above 2 trillion dollars. However, in 2025 SpaceX posted 18.67 billion dollars in revenue against 4.94 billion dollars in consolidated loss. Capex increased fivefold in two years to 20.74 billion dollars. The main reason for the loss is artificial intelligence spending. This is where the Cursor move changes the picture. Instead of telling Wall Street we are losing money, SpaceX can say we are losing money because we are integrating the world’s fastest growing AI coding company. On top of that, Starlink has surpassed 9 million subscribers and is generating positive free cash flow. So it is going public not as a cash burning rocket company but with a space based AI plus subscription revenue story. 5. Industry Impact: What It Means for OpenAI, Anthropic, and Software Stocks This move intensifies the AI coding race. SpaceX is entering direct competition with OpenAI and Anthropic. Technology companies are rushing to coding and other AI tools to increase productivity. Cursor is in the same market as Claude Code and Codex. The result: Sharp selloffs were seen in software, legal, finance, and healthcare company stocks. Names like Oracle and Salesforce are under particular pressure. Some companies linked tens of thousands of layoffs to AI. Cursor also has a weak point: It can be slow with large codebases and its customer support AI hallucinated, triggering a wave of cancellations. If SpaceX’s infrastructure solves these problems, enterprise adoption will accelerate. #SpaceXBids$60BforCursor Checklist: 6 Things You Need to Know 1. Numbers: 60 billion dollar option, 10 billion dollar joint work fee. Cursor was valued at 9.9 billion dollars one year ago. 2. Timing: The purchase could happen this year. IPO targeted for June to July 2026. 3. Infrastructure: Colossus equals one million H100 equivalents. Goal: train its own models, end dependence on Anthropic and OpenAI. 4. Revenue: Cursor has 2 billion dollars in annualized revenue and is used in more than half of the Fortune 500. 5. Strategy: SpaceX merged with xAI in February. The plan to control AI from chip to application is now active. 6. Risk: AI systems create major financial loss. xAI reported a 1.46 billion dollar loss in the third quarter of 2025. SpaceX also posted a 4.94 billion dollar loss in 2025. Final Word: How Did a Rocket Company Become an AI Company SpaceX no longer just launches rockets. It merged with xAI in February and now adds the coding layer with Cursor. It formed a joint venture with Tesla for semiconductor production called Terafab. It plans to place AI data centers in space. The question for investors is clear: Is this a Musk centered conglomerate or a space supported global infrastructure company? The #SpaceXBids$60BforCursor tag is therefore not just an acquisition. It is SpaceX’s move to redefine itself before the biggest public listing of 2026. Code, compute, and space are in the same sentence. The market will decide in June whether to value that at 1.75 trillion dollars.
14
11
0
0