IBM

IBM Price

Closed
IBM
$231,08
-$20,78(-%8,25)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-24 00:37 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-24 00:37, IBM (IBM) is priced at $231,08, with a total market cap of $236,25B, a P/E ratio of 26,06, and a dividend yield of %2,66. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $221,73 and $232,88. The current price is %4,21 above the day's low and %0,77 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 11,73M. Over the past 52 weeks, IBM has traded between $220,75 to $324,90, and the current price is -%28,87 away from the 52-week high.

IBM Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$255,68
Market Cap$236,25B
Volume11,73M
P/E Ratio26,06
Dividend Yield (TTM)%2,66
Dividend Amount$1,68
Diluted EPS (TTM)11,45
Net Income (FY)$10,59B
Revenue (FY)$67,53B
Earnings Date2026-04-22
EPS Estimate1,81
Revenue Estimate$15,63B
Shares Outstanding924,01M
Beta (1Y)0.685
Ex-Dividend Date2026-02-10
Dividend Payment Date2026-03-10

About IBM

International Business Machines Corporation provides integrated solutions and services worldwide. The company operates through four business segments: Software, Consulting, Infrastructure, and Financing. The Software segment offers hybrid cloud platform and software solutions, such as Red Hat, an enterprise open-source solutions; software for business automation, AIOps and management, integration, and application servers; data and artificial intelligence solutions; and security software and services for threat, data, and identity. This segment also provides transaction processing software that supports clients' mission-critical and on-premise workloads in banking, airlines, and retail industries. The Consulting segment offers business transformation services, including strategy, business process design and operations, data and analytics, and system integration services; technology consulting services; and application and cloud platform services. The Infrastructure segment provides on-premises and cloud-based server and storage solutions for its clients' mission-critical and regulated workloads; and support services and solutions for hybrid cloud infrastructure, as well as remanufacturing and remarketing services for used equipment. The Financing segment offers lease, installment payment, loan financing, and short-term working capital financing services. The company was formerly known as Computing-Tabulating-Recording Co. International Business Machines Corporation was incorporated in 1911 and is headquartered in Armonk, New York.
SectorTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology Services
CEOArvind Krishna
HeadquartersArmonk,NY,US
Official Websitehttps://www.ibm.com

IBM (IBM) FAQ

What's the stock price of IBM (IBM) today?

x
IBM (IBM) is currently trading at $231,08, with a 24h change of -%8,25. The 52-week trading range is $220,75–$324,90.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for IBM (IBM)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of IBM (IBM)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of IBM (IBM)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for IBM (IBM)?

x

Should you buy or sell IBM (IBM) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of IBM (IBM)?

x

How to buy IBM (IBM) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

IBM (IBM) Latest News

2026-03-19 02:01

2025 Turing Award Announced: Developer of Quantum Key Distribution Protocol BB84 Wins Prize

Gate News reports that on March 19, 2025, the Turing Award was awarded to American IBM Fellow Charles H. Bennett and Gilles Brassard, Professor of Computer Science and Operations Research at the University of Montreal, Canada. The two are recognized as pioneers of quantum information science. Their most famous achievement, the BB84 protocol, is the world's first quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol, marking the birth of quantum cryptography. Their collaboration began in 1979 when Brassard proposed to Bennett the idea of using quantum mechanics to create "unforgeable banknotes." With the rapid development of quantum computing, traditional public key cryptography systems face serious challenges. Quantum communication (QKD) and post-quantum cryptography (PQC) have become dual core approaches to ensuring the security of future digital communications.

2026-03-11 03:32

IBM collaborates with Signal and Threema to design a quantum-resistant encrypted messaging system

Gate News reports that on March 11, IBM researchers are collaborating with encrypted messaging apps Signal and Threema to design messaging systems resistant to quantum attacks. Cryptography researcher Ethan Heilman pointed out that due to the possibility of "store now, decrypt later" attacks, the recent quantum risks faced by encrypted messaging platforms may be greater than those of Bitcoin—attackers intercept and store encrypted data now, waiting for future quantum computers to become capable of cracking it. Signal has launched the PQXDH upgrade in 2023 to protect new sessions, and by 2025, the SPQR protocol upgrade will extend post-quantum protection to ongoing messages, calls, and media. Threema is working with IBM to explore integrating NIST-standardized ML-KEM algorithms into its system. The research also focuses on protecting metadata, but simply replacing existing components could lead to significant bandwidth increases, requiring a fundamental redesign of the protocol.

2026-02-25 07:20

IBM stock price plunges 13%, wiping out $31 billion in market value, Claude's impact on COBOL business sparks AI replacement concerns

On February 25, IBM's stock price plummeted by approximately 13% in a single day, wiping out nearly $31 billion in market value, prompting Wall Street to reevaluate its core business model. The immediate trigger for the sell-off was the technological breakthrough announced by Anthropic, whose Claude model is said to be capable of reading and modernizing traditional COBOL code—directly targeting IBM's long-standing reliance on mainframe maintenance and enterprise consulting markets. For years, IBM's competitive moat in enterprise infrastructure has been built on deep services related to mainframe systems and COBOL language. Banks, insurance companies, and government databases still run大量 legacy code, making system maintenance, upgrades, and migrations long-term stable revenue sources. However, as AI-powered code migration tools become more mature, market concerns are growing that "AI-automated legacy system transformation" could shorten high-cost consulting project cycles and reduce dependence on traditional service providers. From a market structure perspective, companies are accelerating cost reduction and efficiency improvement strategies, with demand for automated software reengineering rising sharply. If Claude can reliably handle complex legacy code and generate modern architecture solutions, it could significantly lower the barriers to COBOL system migration. Investors have quickly priced in the risk of "AI disruption to enterprise IT services," leading to a concentrated wave of selling. It is noteworthy that billions of lines of COBOL code still run in the global financial system, involving payroll systems, insurance platforms, and critical government infrastructure. Historically, due to technical complexity, high compliance requirements, and migration risks, enterprises preferred long-term outsourcing of maintenance services, a trend that has sustained IBM's consulting and infrastructure profit margins. Now, if AI-assisted code reengineering can be scaled effectively, companies might shift toward faster, lower-cost modernization paths. However, industry experts point out that key system migrations still require high reliability verification and security audits. The accuracy and compliance of AI tools when handling extremely large codebases remain core challenges. Therefore, in the short term, a hybrid model of "AI + traditional services" is more likely than complete replacement. For IBM, whether it can establish technological leadership in enterprise AI modernization solutions will be a critical factor influencing its stock performance and competitive positioning in enterprise technology.

2026-02-23 20:31

Traditional Finance Drop Alert: IBM Falls Over 12%

Gate News bot message: According to the latest data from Gate TradFi, IBM has dropped 12% in the short term, with current volatility significantly higher than recent average levels, and market activity has increased.

2026-02-23 19:31

Traditional Finance Drop Alert: IBM Falls Over 10%

Gate News bot message: According to the latest data from Gate TradFi, IBM experienced a short-term decline of 10%, with current volatility significantly higher than recent average levels, and market activity has increased.

Hot Posts About IBM (IBM)

DataChief

DataChief

2 hours ago
Recently, Google released a study that caused quite a stir: they say that breaking Bitcoin's security now requires 20 times fewer quantum resources than previously thought. Of course, apocalyptic headlines immediately started circulating online, but honestly, this kind of panic appears every year or two. The difference this time is that it's backed by Google, so it sounds more terrifying. Putting the drama aside, what really matters is understanding what's happening. The research team designed a quantum circuit that could theoretically derive your private key from your exposed public key in about 9 minutes. Sounds bad, right? Especially considering that Bitcoin generates blocks every 10 minutes. But here’s the important part: this requires a quantum computer with about 500,000 physical qubits. Google has the Willow chip with just 105 qubits. IBM is around 1,121. We're talking about hundreds of times less than what's needed. What’s interesting is that Google advanced its internal deadline to migrate to post-quantum cryptography to 2029. Previously, it was 2030-2035. This basically says: hey, the threat is closer than we thought, start preparing. Justin Drake from the Ethereum Foundation calculated that the probability of a quantum computer capable of breaking ECDSA appearing before 2032 is only 10%. It’s not imminent, but it’s not negligible either. So, what does this mean for Bitcoin? First, the threat is concentrated on digital signatures, not on the blockchain structure itself or mining. Quantum computing doesn’t make the mining mechanism obsolete. What it attacks is the signing process. There are two real risks: one during the transaction, where someone could intercept it before confirmation, and another targeting addresses whose public keys are already exposed. But this doesn’t affect all bitcoins or all users. Regarding quantum mining, BTQ Technologies published a fascinating analysis on the same day. They found that mining with quantum computers would require 10 to the power of 8 physical qubits under the most favorable assumptions. With Bitcoin’s current difficulty, that jumps to 10 to the power of 23 qubits. To give you an idea, that’s comparable to the energy of a star. Currently, Bitcoin consumes between 13 and 25 gigawatts. Quantum mining is neither physically nor economically feasible. No one would spend that energy to obtain 3.125 bitcoins from a block. The good news is that the industry already has a solution: post-quantum cryptography. NIST completed the standardization with algorithms like ML-DSA and SLH-DSA. At the Bitcoin level, BIP 360 was incorporated into the proposal repository in early 2026. This BIP modifies how the transaction structure works to reduce the exposure of public keys from the source, eliminating the route that currently exposes the key. The reality is that Bitcoin is not a static system. It has constantly evolved: from script updates to Taproot, from privacy improvements to scalability solutions. Quantum challenges could simply be the reason for the next big upgrade. Although quantum computing is advancing faster than expected, we have enough time to respond. The clock is ticking, but we can all hear its sound. What matters now is that cryptographic infrastructure always stays one step ahead of technological threats. It’s not as urgent as headlines suggest, but it’s also not something we can ignore.
0
0
0
0
BoredApeResistance

BoredApeResistance

3 hours ago
Just been looking at some interesting patterns in the market right now, and there's definitely something worth paying attention to with these three projects gaining real momentum heading into 2026. Let me start with Hedera because honestly, the hashgraph technology angle is pretty fascinating. Most people are familiar with traditional blockchain, but Hedera's approach using hashgraph consensus is genuinely different. The way it handles transactions is faster and way more energy-efficient than what you typically see. What's really compelling is the enterprise backing here - you've got Google, IBM, and Boeing on the governing council, which isn't just marketing noise. These are companies that actually care about performance and security. I've noticed Hedera hashgraph is becoming more relevant as enterprises explore real-world applications in supply chain, carbon credits, and digital identity. The fact that major corporations are actively involved in network decisions gives it a different feel than most crypto projects. Sui Network caught my attention for different reasons. The team came from Meta, which already tells you something about the engineering caliber. What's working for them is the parallel execution model - basically they can process tons of transactions simultaneously instead of sequentially. Developers seem genuinely excited about building on Sui, which is rare. Gaming studios specifically are gravitating toward it because the speed and low latency actually matter for user experience. When you see organic developer adoption like this, it usually signals something real is happening. Then there's Ethena with USDe. This one's interesting because it's not trying to be just another stablecoin. The synthetic dollar model they built actually generates yield while maintaining stability - kind of like an internet bond as they describe it. DeFi users have been experimenting with this concept, and the capital inflows have been substantial. Billions locked within a short timeframe shows there's genuine interest in this financial model. What ties these three together is momentum. Hedera hashgraph technology is attracting serious institutional players, Sui's developer ecosystem is expanding rapidly, and Ethena's introducing a genuinely different approach to on-chain finance. If you're watching the crypto market, HBAR, SUI, and ENA are definitely worth keeping on your radar. The innovation and adoption trends around these projects feel different from typical hype cycles.
0
0
0
0
ZKProofster

ZKProofster

8 hours ago
Been diving into Stellar XLM news lately and honestly, there's a lot more going on here than most people realize. The whole cross-border payment narrative everyone talks about is just the foundation now. What's actually interesting is how Stellar's positioning itself in this DeFi and Real-World Asset wave. Let me break down what makes XLM different from the noise. Stellar's been around since 2014, built with this pragmatic philosophy of actually connecting banks and financial institutions rather than trying to burn the whole system down. Sounds boring compared to the revolution talk, but it's actually working. You've got IBM, MoneyGram, Franklin Templeton actively using this infrastructure. That's not hype, that's real adoption. The core utility is straightforward: XLM acts as a bridge currency. Someone sends dollars, the network converts to XLM in seconds, shoots it across the globe for fractions of a cent, and converts to the receiving currency on the other end. Sender and receiver never touch crypto, don't need to understand blockchain. The mechanics just work in the background. Plus every transaction requires a microscopic XLM fee and every account needs a minimum balance - that's actually genius as a spam prevention mechanism, not some corporate extraction scheme. Now here's where Stellar XLM news gets compelling: the Soroban smart contract upgrade changed the entire game. For years this was just a payment rail, efficient but limited. Soroban opened it up to full programmability. Developers are building AMMs, lending protocols, complex DeFi applications directly on Stellar. That means XLM is now locked up as collateral in these protocols instead of just passing through as a bridge. Different demand dynamic entirely. The RWA tokenization angle is where institutional money is actually paying attention. Traditional finance titans are issuing hundreds of millions in tokenized government money funds on Stellar. Why? Three reasons: built-in compliance controls at the protocol level (token freezing, allow-lists, KYC/AML enforcement), cryptographic finality in 3-5 seconds instead of days, and predictable microscopic fees that make backend costs predictable for enterprises. That's infrastructure-grade reliability. XRP comparison is interesting because they're siblings technically - same founder, similar lineage - but opposite philosophies. XRP is top-down, targeting massive multinational banks and central banks to replace SWIFT at the institutional level. Stellar's bottom-up: individual users in emerging markets, smaller payment processors, developers building on-chain. Different markets, different approaches. The reality check though: XLM faces real competition. Stablecoins exploding on Solana, Arbitrum, Base - these Layer-1s offer cheap payments too. Stellar's also got massive circulating supply (33+ billion currently out of 50 billion max), which historically means slower price action than narrative-driven altcoins during bull runs. People generally see this as steady utility play, not a get-rich-quick asset. Current market data shows XLM trading around $0.18, down 2.2% in 24 hours, with market cap around $5.93B. Not exactly screaming momentum, but that's kind of the point - this isn't a momentum play. What makes Stellar XLM news worth following right now is the inflection point. It's genuinely transitioning from 'payment rail for the unbanked' into 'infrastructure for programmable finance and tokenized assets.' That's a narrative shift that institutional money actually cares about. Whether it translates to price appreciation depends on adoption velocity and how competitive pressure from other chains plays out. If you're thinking about this as a long-term infrastructure play rather than a short-term speculation, the fundamentals are solid. Real partnerships, real use cases, real technical evolution. Just don't expect the kind of volatility you'd see from narrative-driven assets.
0
0
0
0