April 1st, Wednesday, Evening Market Analysis On the four-hour timeframe, after a price decline, the recovery strength is insufficient, and the price is currently under pressure around the midline. In terms of volume, there is no clear bullish pattern support, and moving averages are difficult to form a consistent upward hook. During the small-cycle correction, there is obvious resistance, and short-term oscillations have not continued to push higher. Technically, the trading channel remains flat, with the price gradually oscillating and recovering after hitting the bottom, showing a clear shift between bulls and bears. Although the main trend has pulled back after a rally, it has a strong impact on short-term fluctuations, making it difficult to form a sustained trend. In the oscillating downward rhythm, there is still a possibility of testing the bottom again. Bitcoin personal trading suggestion: Short near the 68,800 area, target 67,800-66,800. Altcoin personal trading suggestion: Short near the 2,145 area, target 2,080-1,930. $BTC $ETH $SOL #金银同步走强 #以太坊基金会质押4620万美元ETH

The chains holding the most capital are not the ones making the most money. But that gap doesn’t always resolve the way people expect. Let’s start with the surface layer. Solana is generating $8.73M in daily fees.
The entire Ethereum stack combined is doing $122K. At the same time, Ethereum L2s secure $31B+ in value.
Solana’s DeFi TVL sits closer to $6.03B. So the system storing more capital is earning less at the base layer. That looks like a mismatch.
But it’s more of a design tradeoff than a flaw. This didn’t happen by accident. EIP-4844 did exactly what it was supposed to do. It made blockspace cheap.
It made L2s usable at scale.
It removed one of the biggest barriers to adoption. But it also changed where value is captured. When blockspace becomes abundant, it behaves less like a scarce asset and more like infrastructure. So fees don’t disappear.
They get redistributed. On Ethereum, more of that value flows to:
• L2s
• applications
• sequencers
• execution layers On Solana, activity still translates more directly into base layer fees. So even with less capital, the system generates more visible revenue at the chain level. That’s the real difference. Ethereum is optimizing for:
• scale
• accessibility
• ecosystem expansion Solana is optimizing for:
• tighter value capture at the base layer
• direct monetization of activity Both models work.
But they produce very different outcomes for value capture. Because eventually, markets ask: Where does the value actually accrue? If a chain processes billions in activity but captures little at the base layer,
that value doesn’t vanish. It moves up the stack. That makes the base layer harder to price, not necessarily weaker. That’s the unresolved piece for L2s. Value accrual to ETH is:
• less direct
• more distributed
• still evolving It’s not broken.
But it’s not fully priced in either. And this is where things get interesting. The market is still anchored to:
“L2s scale Ethereum.” Which is true. But scaling and value capture are not the same thing. Over time, one of three things likely happens: • L2s improve how value flows back to the base layer
• value continues concentrating at higher layers
• the market shifts to pricing the full ecosystem, not just the chain Right now, we’re in btw. Capital sits on one side.
Revenue shows up on another. And the connection between them is still being figured out.

$ETH.D to 15% at least this year