2026-01-17 16:31:16

A recent interesting phenomenon is that large capital is starting to take the regulated privacy track seriously. Take Dusk Protocol as an example, where the proportion of institutional investors' holdings has steadily increased from 45% to 70% this year. This shift in chip distribution is definitely not accidental.

Why is this happening? The key lies in the fact that after the European crypto market regulatory framework was implemented, the Dusk network demonstrated exceptional compliance adaptability. This has led family offices and pension funds to change their perspective; they no longer see these tokens as mere speculative assets but as digitalized production materials backed by real business.

The most convincing data comes from market research: whenever more than ten million euros of real assets are listed on-chain, the secondary market liquidity exhibits a clear positive locking effect. This process is entirely led by institutions, gradually eliminating pure emotional fluctuations, and the market is evolving from a speculation phase to a value discovery phase.

In the current macro environment, protocols with real financial clearing functions are becoming the first choice for large funds. Not because of hype, but because these projects truly solve problems.

DUSK0,96%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-20 12:09

Institutions jumped from 45 to 70, this move is indeed different... The compliance licenses are so aggressive once they are issued? Honestly, I don't quite understand why pension funds suddenly trust the privacy sector; it still seems risky. Wait, are RWA worth tens of millions of euros really being posted on-chain like this? Which big player is so aggressive?

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_vibing

· 01-20 09:35

45% to 70%, this chip transfer is quite intense. Institutions are really starting to play for real.

View OriginalReply0

TokenRationEater

· 01-17 17:01

Wow, institutions have increased from 45% to 70%? This is the real battle for chips, not those retail investors shouting about sudden surges and crashes every day.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySlayer

· 01-17 16:59

70% institutional holdings... This is a sign that big money is starting to take it seriously, no longer just a playground for retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 01-17 16:59

70% institutional holdings... Now it's really different, the privacy track finally has serious players to participate --- Compliance is indeed the breaking point. With pension funds involved, what else can we do? --- The question is, are there really that many RWA on-chain in Europe, or is it just a concept ahead of its time? --- I believe in the lock-in effect of institutions, but I'm just worried that it's all just good data and not much real action. --- Alright, from speculation to value discovery, I'm tired of hearing that. In the end, it's all about who can cash out faster. --- Dusk has indeed seized the regulatory window, but what about domestic users? We can't just keep waiting for Europe's stance. --- Real financial clearing functions... sound good, but transaction fees are about to skyrocket again. --- This is the way big capital should play, leaving retail traders to hype themselves up.

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 01-17 16:49

Institutions have increased from 45% to 70%, which is truly a concentration of chips. However, I still want to see how long the RWA data of ten million euros can really hold up; it feels a bit like a new round of storytelling.

View OriginalReply0