2026-01-16 04:29:47

Power corrupts, and humans inevitably become untrustworthy once they gain it. This is an ancient truth. But math? Math doesn't lie. It doesn't bend to interests or ego. This is why cryptographic trust works—and why it's destined to reshape how we organize ourselves. The rules are written in code, not character.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrödingersNode

· 7h ago

Math won't betray you, but code can't escape political games either. Don't be too naive.

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 7h ago

Code speaks, but human mouths can deceive.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 7h ago

lol nice try but code gets exploited just like humans do... have you *seen* the audit reports lately? red flags detected across half the "immutable" protocols out there. math doesn't lie sure, but implementations? those are written by people who very much do. DYOR but here's my analysis—this ideology needs immediate attention before someone gets rekt thinking code alone fixes governance.

Reply0

BlockTalk

· 7h ago

Mathematics doesn't deceive, but human nature is the biggest black box.

View OriginalReply0

PumpAnalyst

· 7h ago

Listen, brother, cryptographic trust sounds impressive, but let me tell you, no matter how perfect the algorithm is, it can't withstand a dealer's sudden big move. Technical analysis can't fool people.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 7h ago

Governing the country with mathematics sounds great, but when it comes to implementation, it still depends on people to execute... No matter how perfect the code is written, it can't withstand human greed.

View OriginalReply0

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 7h ago

Algorithms are more trustworthy than human nature. This logic may sound reasonable at first, but can it truly be completely decentralized?

View OriginalReply0