Traditional DeFi, at its core, is a liquidity pool model where you don't deposit a single asset but rather a mix of assets (wstETH, FBTC, WBTC, crvUSD). It appears diversified, but in reality, it's risk bundled together.


As long as one asset inside the pool encounters a problem, the risk can propagate through the pool, ultimately affecting everyone's returns and even the principal.
In contrast, @TermMaxFi takes a different approach: single collateral + market isolation.
Every profit has a clear corresponding collateral asset, with no mixing and no risk contagion, making it much safer compared to traditional DeFi.
WBTC0,07%
CRVUSD-0,31%
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • 14
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
Post-RainTvl
· 04-22 20:12
The idea of single collateralization + isolated markets is quite similar to "compartments," at least preventing a single mine from blowing up the entire ship.
View OriginalReply0
MetalRoboticArm
· 04-22 08:40
I am more concerned about: how the clearing mechanism, oracles, and extreme market liquidations are handled under isolated markets? Security is not just about "not mixing."
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNap
· 04-21 07:25
TermMaxFi, where each profit corresponds to a clear collateral, makes accounting and auditing more transparent, and also helps to better identify responsibility boundaries in case of issues.
View OriginalReply0
NodeOutsider
· 04-21 06:32
However, traditional AMMs also have advantages such as deep liquidity and low trading slippage. The key still depends on the asset quality in the pool and risk control parameters; it cannot be generalized.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-d2929483
· 04-21 05:24
That's too straightforward; a pool is just a risk bundler.
View OriginalReply0
FrontrunFail
· 04-21 05:22
Is there a link/document? I want to see how you define "no risk contagion," for example, whether sharing liquidity or a common insurance pool counts as contagion.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4aa73916
· 04-21 05:19
Single collateral means that the risk is more concentrated on the collateral itself; asset selection, discount rate, and liquidation threshold must be set conservatively enough.
View OriginalReply0
ForkingDrama
· 04-21 05:19
Indeed, as soon as a certain pegged asset decouples in the pool, LP profits immediately turn into "covering the hole."
View OriginalReply0
FeeSwitchLobbyist
· 04-21 05:07
This logic is somewhat similar to traditional financial SPV asset isolation, with a much shorter risk transmission chain, suitable for funds seeking stability.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin