Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
California Governor Challenges Trump Over His Decisions on International Conflicts
California Governor Gavin Newsom has strongly criticized President Donald Trump, accusing him of providing misleading information to the American public regarding his military conflict initiatives. According to Jin10, Newsom stated that Trump's approach lacks a coherent strategy and does not consider the existential threats facing the nation.\n\n## Newsom questions the lack of planning in foreign policy\n\nCalifornia's governor's statements highlight his concern over the absence of a comprehensive plan to address both conflict resolution and long-term strategic risks. According to Newsom, the military actions taken under the current federal administration lack legal legitimacy and a solid strategic foundation. The California governor has insisted that any military intervention must be based on clearly defined objectives and within an international legal framework.\n\n## Political divisions around national security strategy\n\nNewsom's criticisms reflect ongoing political tensions between Democrats and the current federal government regarding foreign policy and national security issues. These disagreements underscore philosophical differences about how presidential power should be exercised in international conflict contexts, fueling public debate over the direction and feasibility of the decisions made by the Trump administration.