Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Is $60,000 the bottom for Bitcoin? Multi-dimensional Analysis
Currently, $60,000 is considered a critical threshold, mainly based on the in-depth game across the following three dimensions, which are also the most vulnerable points:
1. Psychological Defense vs. Trap of Inducing Short Squeeze (The Psychological Trap)
$60,000 is a very strong psychological barrier of an integer.
* Question: The market often does not precisely stop falling at the support level everyone is watching.
* Risk: There is often a **"false breakdown"**. Institutions may deliberately break below $60,000 (for example, drop to around $58,500) to induce retail investors to hit stop-loss levels, clear leverage, and then quickly recover. If you stubbornly hold onto the $60,000 figure, you are easily shaken out.
2. Symmetry of Wave C (Wave C Equality)
In Elliott Wave Theory, Wave C usually has a certain proportional relationship with Wave A (typically C = A or C = 1.618 × A).
* Calculation: * Wave A decline: 92,000 - 61,500 = 30,500 USD.
* If Wave C is equal in length to Wave A: Starting from the high of Wave B at 66,200, 66,200 - 30,500 = 35,700 USD.
* Hard reality: According to strict wave ratios, Wave C has not fully bottomed out at $60,000. If it breaks below $60,000 in March, the next technical target could directly point to the $52,000 - $55,000 range. So, the current support at $60,000 is more based on "consensus" rather than the final wave ratio.
3. Miner and Institutional Cost Zones
* Chip distribution: By the end of 2025 to early 2026, many institutions completed large-scale turnover in the $58,000 - $62,000 range.
* Conclusion: This area is the average cost basis for holdings. If the price remains below $60,000 for a long time, it means most of the recent institutional entries are at a loss, which could trigger chain liquidation pressure.
In March, we need to watch out for these "three types of movements":
| Movement Type | Characteristics | Response Strategy |
| Firm Defense | Price quickly rebounds with volume after touching $60,200, forming a long lower shadow. | Positive signal: Wave C has ended, can try a small position. |
| Bearish Penetration | Declines a little each day without volume, gradually breaking through $60,000. | Extremely dangerous: indicates buying momentum is exhausted, Wave C is extending. Do not buy the dip! |
| Spike Rebound | Suddenly drops to $58,000 and then recovers to $61,000 within an hour. | Trap of Inducing Short Squeeze: This is a typical institutional tactic. Holding above $60,000 is a victory. |
Core Advice
Don’t focus solely on the $60,000 point. What matters is the weekly closing price from March 1 to March 7. As long as the weekly close remains above $60,000, this wave model remains valid. #深度创作营 $BTC