NEW YORK, Feb 3 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Elon Musk has launched himself into M&A orbit. He clinched the biggest deal in history on Monday, as SpaceX agreed to acquire xAI in a deal that values his rocket and satellite company at $1 trillion and his artificial intelligence outfit at $250 billion. The numbers only make sense on Musk’s own absurd terms. As the duo prepares for an initial public offering, terrestrial precedent implies a hasty fall back to Earth.
Since both are private companies where Musk retains voting control, information is murky. SpaceX generated about $8 billion of EBITDA on as much as $16 billion in revenue last year, Reuters reported. Projections warrant skepticism given Musk’s tendency to overpromise, but the company anticipates more than $22 billion of revenue next year. Assume similar profitability, and it would produce $11 billion of EBITDA, valuing the company at an out-of-this world multiple of 90 times. Its boss has achieved such a stellar feat before: carmaker Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab trades at an incredible 103 times.
The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.
Valuing xAI is an even more nebulous exercise. The company lost $1.5 billion for the third quarter on $107 million of revenue, according to Bloomberg, opens new tab. Still, the top line doubled from the prior three months. Generously assume that it keeps up this pace, and it would exceed $6 billion this year. Anthropic, a truly leading AI lab, is targeting between $20 billion and $26 billion of sales in 2026, Reuters reported. That places its recent $350 billion valuation at 15 times revenue. On the same multiple, xAI would be worth about $90 billion.
What’s a few hundred billion compared to the stars? Musk describes, opens new tab the deal’s rationale as “scaling to make a sentient sun to understand the Universe.” This, and talk of launching data centers into space, sounds somewhere between optimistic to delusional. The same could be said of the value public markets have ascribed to the billionaire’s corporate efforts to date.
A less encouraging read of history can be found in past mega-M&A. Mobile network operator Vodafone (VOD.L), opens new tab bought Mannesmann for $203 billion in 2000, and dot-com-bubble pioneer AOL merged with Time Warner in a $165 billion deal in 2001. Both were built on dreams of world-changing technologies, 3G wireless and the internet. Those really were valuable developments.
Vodafone later took multiple charges, its shares fell, and it retrenched. AOL fared even worse, writing down $99 billion in 2002 before its tie-up unraveled. Musk’s self-referential merger universe, if anything, revolves around even more outlandish hopes.
Follow Robert Cyran on Bluesky, opens new tab.
Context News
Elon Musk said in a letter on February 2 that his rocket and satellite company SpaceX had acquired his artificial intelligence and social networking company xAI. The transaction values SpaceX at $1 trillion and xAI at $250 billion, Reuters reported.
Musk’s letter did not provide financial details. He talked about the company’s plan to build data centers in orbit, saying, “this marks not just the next chapter, but the next book in SpaceX and xAI’s mission: scaling to make a sentient sun to understand the Universe and extend the light of consciousness to the stars!”
SpaceX is preparing for an initial public offering later this year, Reuters previously reported. The company is considering Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley for senior roles on the listing, according to the report.
The purchase of xAI sets a new record for the world’s largest M&A deal. The record was previously by Vodafone’s purchase of Germany’s Mannesmann in a hostile takeover valued at $203 billion in 2000, according to data compiled by LSEG.
For more insights like these, click here, opens new tab to try Breakingviews for free.
Editing by Jonathan Guilford; Production by Maya Nandhini
Suggested Topics:
Breakingviews
Sustainable & EV Supply Chain
ADAS, AV & Safety
Breakingviews
Reuters Breakingviews is the world’s leading source of agenda-setting financial insight. As the Reuters brand for financial commentary, we dissect the big business and economic stories as they break around the world every day. A global team of about 30 correspondents in New York, London, Hong Kong and other major cities provides expert analysis in real time.
Sign up for a free trial of our full service at https://www.breakingviews.com/trial and follow us on X @Breakingviews and at www.breakingviews.com. All opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Share
X
Facebook
Linkedin
Email
Link
Purchase Licensing Rights
Robert Cyran
Thomson Reuters
Robert Cyran, U.S. tech columnist, joined Breakingviews in London in 2003 and moved four years later to New York, where he continues to cover global technology, pharmaceuticals and special situations. Robert began his career at Forbes magazine, where he assisted in the startup of the international version of the magazine. Before working at Breakingviews he worked as a market researcher and reporter covering the pharmaceutical industry. Robert has a Masters degree in economics from Birmingham University and an undergraduate degree from George Washington University.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
SpaceX’s $1.25 trln deal risks burn-up on re-entry
Companies
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Follow
Tesla Inc
Follow
Vodafone Group PLC
Follow
NEW YORK, Feb 3 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Elon Musk has launched himself into M&A orbit. He clinched the biggest deal in history on Monday, as SpaceX agreed to acquire xAI in a deal that values his rocket and satellite company at $1 trillion and his artificial intelligence outfit at $250 billion. The numbers only make sense on Musk’s own absurd terms. As the duo prepares for an initial public offering, terrestrial precedent implies a hasty fall back to Earth.
Since both are private companies where Musk retains voting control, information is murky. SpaceX generated about $8 billion of EBITDA on as much as $16 billion in revenue last year, Reuters reported. Projections warrant skepticism given Musk’s tendency to overpromise, but the company anticipates more than $22 billion of revenue next year. Assume similar profitability, and it would produce $11 billion of EBITDA, valuing the company at an out-of-this world multiple of 90 times. Its boss has achieved such a stellar feat before: carmaker Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab trades at an incredible 103 times.
The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.
Valuing xAI is an even more nebulous exercise. The company lost $1.5 billion for the third quarter on $107 million of revenue, according to Bloomberg, opens new tab. Still, the top line doubled from the prior three months. Generously assume that it keeps up this pace, and it would exceed $6 billion this year. Anthropic, a truly leading AI lab, is targeting between $20 billion and $26 billion of sales in 2026, Reuters reported. That places its recent $350 billion valuation at 15 times revenue. On the same multiple, xAI would be worth about $90 billion.
What’s a few hundred billion compared to the stars? Musk describes, opens new tab the deal’s rationale as “scaling to make a sentient sun to understand the Universe.” This, and talk of launching data centers into space, sounds somewhere between optimistic to delusional. The same could be said of the value public markets have ascribed to the billionaire’s corporate efforts to date.
A less encouraging read of history can be found in past mega-M&A. Mobile network operator Vodafone (VOD.L), opens new tab bought Mannesmann for $203 billion in 2000, and dot-com-bubble pioneer AOL merged with Time Warner in a $165 billion deal in 2001. Both were built on dreams of world-changing technologies, 3G wireless and the internet. Those really were valuable developments.
Vodafone later took multiple charges, its shares fell, and it retrenched. AOL fared even worse, writing down $99 billion in 2002 before its tie-up unraveled. Musk’s self-referential merger universe, if anything, revolves around even more outlandish hopes.
Follow Robert Cyran on Bluesky, opens new tab.
Context News
For more insights like these, click here, opens new tab to try Breakingviews for free.
Editing by Jonathan Guilford; Production by Maya Nandhini
Breakingviews
Reuters Breakingviews is the world’s leading source of agenda-setting financial insight. As the Reuters brand for financial commentary, we dissect the big business and economic stories as they break around the world every day. A global team of about 30 correspondents in New York, London, Hong Kong and other major cities provides expert analysis in real time.
Sign up for a free trial of our full service at https://www.breakingviews.com/trial and follow us on X @Breakingviews and at www.breakingviews.com. All opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Share
X
Facebook
Linkedin
Email
Link
Purchase Licensing Rights
Robert Cyran
Thomson Reuters
Robert Cyran, U.S. tech columnist, joined Breakingviews in London in 2003 and moved four years later to New York, where he continues to cover global technology, pharmaceuticals and special situations. Robert began his career at Forbes magazine, where he assisted in the startup of the international version of the magazine. Before working at Breakingviews he worked as a market researcher and reporter covering the pharmaceutical industry. Robert has a Masters degree in economics from Birmingham University and an undergraduate degree from George Washington University.