Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Tezos Breaks Away from the Limited Validator Subset with the Tallinn Upgrade
Tezos, the layer 1 proof-of-stake blockchain network, has taken a decisive step in its evolution with the launch of Tallinn, its twentieth protocol upgrade. This innovation marks a fundamental shift in how the network manages validation, removing the old limitation that restricted the attestation process to a subset of validators. Now, Tezos’ architecture allows all network participants, known as ‘bakers’ or validators, to attest to each block generated, rather than this responsibility being confined to a small group of nodes.
The Tallinn upgrade represents a turning point in network performance. By reducing block times to six seconds on the base layer, Tezos demonstrates its commitment to speed without compromising security. According to Cointelegraph, the changes introduced go far beyond simple incremental improvements, transforming the network’s fundamental capacity to process transactions.
Redefined Validation Model: From Subset to Full Participation
The most revolutionary aspect of Tallinn is how it overcomes the historical limitation of the validator subset. In earlier versions of the protocol, only a portion of bakers could actively participate in block certification, creating inefficiencies and concentrating consensus power. With the new implementation, this restrictive model is completely eliminated.
The technical solution behind this transformation uses BLS (Boneh-Lynn-Shacham) cryptographic signatures, which have a unique capability: aggregating multiple signatures into a single one per block. This mechanism allows all validators to sign each block without causing exponential data overhead. By distributing the validation load evenly across the entire network of bakers, it significantly reduces the pressure on each individual node, paving the way for even more aggressive future reductions in block times.
Storage Efficiency: A Quantum Leap
Beyond validation speed, Tallinn introduces an address indexing mechanism that addresses one of the chronic challenges of blockchain nodes: storage. This system eliminates redundant address data accumulated in the network’s history, drastically reducing space requirements for applications operating within the Tezos ecosystem.
Project representatives highlight that this innovation improves storage efficiency by a factor of 100, a significant enhancement not to be overlooked. For developers and node operators, this means lower infrastructure costs and greater accessibility to fully participate in the network.
Historical Perspective: The Race for Scalability
The urgency of optimizations like Tallinn makes sense when examining the evolution of blockchain networks. Bitcoin, the first generation, produces blocks approximately every 10 minutes, resulting in a capacity of only seven transactions per second (TPS). Ethereum significantly improved this landscape with 15-30 TPS on its base layer, but both networks remain insufficient for mass e-commerce or daily payment applications.
This limitation led to the development of layer 2 solutions. Bitcoin uses the Lightning Network, which facilitates off-chain transactions between users, settling only net balances on the base layer. Ethereum adopted a more complex modular approach, with an ecosystem of L2 networks that separate execution, consensus, and data availability layers, seeking architectural flexibility.
In contrast, monolithic networks like Solana integrate all these functions into a single layer, deliberately sacrificing modular separation to maximize speed. Each approach has advantages and trade-offs: modularity offers flexibility but complexity; monolithism promises speed but sacrifices some decentralization.
Tallinn positions Tezos in a third category: continuous optimization of the PoS layer 1 model without relying solely on L2 solutions. Each incremental upgrade brings Tezos closer to speeds rivaling more specialized systems, all while maintaining its focus on decentralized governance and participatory validation.