2026-01-20 05:38:59

The constant changes in the project are exhausting. Early statements, recent adjustments to the points system—after a series of operations, it only proves one thing—the project's team indeed has limited vision and doesn't really care about the community.

Today, they think they gave too many points and can reset your points at any moment; tomorrow, they find the airdrop quota exceeds expectations and can directly revoke your eligibility for the airdrop. Such capricious practices cause significant damage to participants' trust, and perhaps the project team has never considered this.

Instead of waiting for the next rule change, it's better to focus your energy on more stable and transparent exchange platforms. Choosing projects supported by reputable institutions and with more standardized governance is a wiser long-term decision. At least, it allows you to sleep peacefully.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerGas

· 01-22 18:21

A typical principal-agent problem, the project team has not established an effective commitment mechanism at all... Forget it, projects with such low governance should have been removed from the portfolio long ago.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_huntress

· 01-20 20:37

I've seen through this routine a long time ago; changing policies overnight is really unbelievable. It's another "zeroing points" trick. What will they zero out next time? Instead of waiting for these people to cause more trouble, it's better to buy the dip in projects backed by institutions. It's exhausting, everyone. It's really just a waste of time.

View OriginalReply0

SpeakWithHatOn

· 01-20 10:38

It's the same old trick again, promising that the points will be reset today, truly impressive. I'm done with this, I might as well look for transparent projects. I really can't stand this backstabbing behavior. If I had known, I wouldn't have bothered. Changing the rules over and over again, who can take it? I knew the moment the points were reset that this project probably never cared about the community's feelings. Damn, changing the rules again? What do you think the community is? Instead of constantly worrying and waiting for the next shock, it's better to find a more reliable one. This operation really confuses people, changing just like that. What are the project creators thinking? Such manipulation of the community's trust. Right now, I just want to find something more stable, not be scammed like this every day. Playing both sides so many times, it's time to wake up.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterLucky

· 01-20 06:08

Coming back to zero? I've seen this trick too many times, I'm really speechless. --- No, the project team’s recent actions are truly outrageous. Where are the promised rules? --- Wait, have they really thought about the community’s feelings? I can't see it. --- Doing things like resetting points to zero—what does that say? It just shows they don’t see us as people at all. --- Instead of watching this face-changing every day, I might as well look for some reliable trading pairs. --- The phrase "changing faces" is used perfectly here—that’s exactly how it feels. So annoying. --- So, it’s better to choose projects that are transparent and backed by institutions, so we don’t have to be on edge every day. --- If this keeps up, who would still dare to participate? Once trust is broken, it’s very hard to repair. --- I just want to know, when will I encounter a project team that doesn’t scam?

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekMaster

· 01-20 06:06

I'm truly exhausted by this wave of zeroing out points. Where are the promised rules? They change at will. How can we keep going like this... Rather than being cut every day, it's better to find a reliable trading platform. I should have seen through these project teams' true colors long ago. This move is really brilliant. My friend was directly overwhelmed.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureVerifier

· 01-20 06:00

technically speaking, this reeks of insufficient validation on their end. they're moving goalposts like it's a deprecated practice nobody told them about. ngl, the attack vector here isn't even subtle—they're basically admitting zero governance framework. seen this pattern before, always ends the same way. not touching this with a ten-foot audit trail.

Reply0

LiquidatedThrice

· 01-20 05:58

I think this kind of project has long been disqualified; the same old routine of repeatedly cutting leeks. --- The set of zeroing points is really incredible; they collect today for tomorrow, and the project team is just outrageous. --- It's better to look for those backed by major institutions; stop messing around. --- Again with this kind of ever-changing trickery, I won't touch it anymore. --- Basically, it's disrespecting the community. If we wait any longer, it will become a leek farm. --- I advise everyone to avoid this kind of project directly; there's nothing good to say. --- Once trust is broken, it's very hard to stick it back together. The project team's operations are really brainless. --- I just want to know who could withdraw points before they were zeroed out; anyway, I didn't manage to do it. --- Instead of watching the rules change every day, it's better to relax and stay in a reliable place.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeTrustFund

· 01-20 05:55

Really, I've seen many projects like this, just to scam people out of their money. --- At the moment the points are reset, I knew I should withdraw. --- The phrase "changing plans frequently" is used perfectly, it really expresses my feelings. --- Instead of watching the market and rules change every day, it's better to find reliable exchanges. --- The project team really doesn't take us seriously. --- That wave of resetting points directly broke my trust; I can't believe in it anymore. --- If I had known, I wouldn't have bothered with this; it's a waste of time. --- Where are the promised unchanging rules? They change them right away, it's outrageous. --- I think I should look for projects backed by institutions, at least I would have some confidence. --- I've seen enough of this kind of farce once.

View OriginalReply0