69 hours grinding with the legendary one versus $69M stacked up? That's the age-old dilemma right there. Time or money—pick your poison in this game. Some might argue that spending 69 hours learning from someone who's been through the crypto cycles could pay dividends way beyond a quick $69M play. Others would take the capital, run with it, and let the numbers do the talking. What's your move? The market's got a funny way of making these choices matter.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasGrillMastervip
· 01-21 03:13
Honestly, spending 69 hours learning this idea is a bit naive... The ones who really make money are those who learn as they go.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSellervip
· 01-19 22:37
Ha, it's the same old trick of time vs. money. I choose neither and go all in directly—that's the way to win.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemistvip
· 01-18 16:51
Honestly, 69 hours of studying isn't as exciting as a big gamble, but the losses come quickly.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmivip
· 01-18 16:47
69 hours of study? I'll choose to spend money and let the bullets fly
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHomevip
· 01-18 16:40
69 hours of learning vs 69M direct charge, I think it depends on the person. Beginners will definitely learn, while veterans might just dare to gamble.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)