Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Stalled by Legal and Administrative Obstacles
Source: CoinTribune Original Title: Bureaucracy Halts US National Bitcoin Stockpile Initiative Original Link:
Background
The creation of a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the United States was announced by presidential decree in March 2025. This project aimed to hold BTC seized by the state, without the possibility of purchase on the open market. A year later, no Bitcoin acquisition has been made due to complex legal blockages.
The Implementation Stalemate
The idea of a strategic Bitcoin reserve officially took shape in March 2025, when the Trump administration promulgated an executive order establishing a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve” and a “Digital Asset Stockpile” also including certain altcoins.
Through this decree, the White House intended to preserve and potentially strengthen the country’s crypto holdings, but with a major constraint: the prohibition of buying Bitcoin on the open market. Only BTC seized in the context of judicial procedures could feed this reserve.
One year later, Patrick Witt, director of the White House Crypto Council, admits that the implementation is slowed down by legal complexities: “it seems simple, but then you hit obscure legal provisions, and why one agency cannot do it, but another could.”
He indicates that several government entities, notably the Department of Justice and the Office of Legal Counsel, are still examining the legal implications of the scheme. In this context, no clear framework has yet been defined to move the project forward.
Main Obstacles Identified
Despite these limits, Patrick Witt asserts that the project “remains on the priority list.” However, for now, it resembles more a political intention not translated into reality. The presidential ambitions displayed in 2025 struggle to withstand the regulatory heaviness of the federal system.
Growing Disillusionment in the Bitcoin Community
In the face of this administrative paralysis, part of the Bitcoin community is becoming increasingly critical of the Trump administration.
Bitcoin maximalist Justin Bechler didn’t mince words: “believing that the federal government will one day build a strategic Bitcoin reserve requires a total disconnect from reality,” he declared, denouncing “empty talks, vague references, and Washington political opportunism.”
No Bitcoin acquisition has been made since the signing of the decree. The absence of a concrete plan, combined with unclear communication, fuels growing mistrust toward the authorities’ real intentions.
In August 2025, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent proposed that the government explore budget-neutral Bitcoin acquisition strategies. These solutions would consist, for example, of converting part of other reserve assets or revaluing precious metal holdings to finance BTC purchases without increasing the deficit. However, no concrete measures followed this announcement.
Uncertain Future
The fate of the American strategic reserve remains uncertain, caught between political will and administrative inertia. In a context where some countries are considering or already initiating sovereign crypto reserves, this inertia could prove costly for the United States strategically. If Washington doesn’t decide, the initiative could bog down, risking to discredit a strong signal sent to the markets.