Two fundamental questions separate viable projects from the rest:



1. **Revenue potential** — Can this actually generate value and returns?
2. **Market adoption** — Will real users actually use it?

These aren't Web3-specific gatekeeping rules. They're universal principles that apply whether you're building a SaaS startup or launching a blockchain protocol. Profitable monetization models and genuine user demand remain non-negotiable for long-term success.

The difference? In crypto, the stakes feel higher because the industry moves faster and funds flow more aggressively. But the fundamentals don't change. Strip away the tokenomics and hype cycles, and you're left with timeless product-market fit requirements.

When evaluating any crypto project—whether it's an emerging layer-1 or a DeFi platform—filter through these two lenses first. Everything else is noise.
DEFI4,22%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWallflowervip
· 01-21 14:03
Well said, these two points can really filter out 99% of junk coins. There are too many projects that only tell stories, and only a few can truly make money.
View OriginalReply0
MemecoinTradervip
· 01-21 13:50
nah the real filter is watching which narratives move sentiment first. fundamentals are just cope for late entries lmao
Reply0
WagmiAnonvip
· 01-20 17:35
That's true, but most projects can't even see these two points clearly, and they're still talking about tokenomics...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermitvip
· 01-18 16:43
Basically, it's about profits and users; everything else is just talk. The crypto world is particularly real in this regard.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodlervip
· 01-18 16:41
It sounds good, but there are very few who truly dare to filter based on these two standards. Most are still dazzled by tokenomics and stories.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretfulvip
· 01-18 16:29
Well said, finally someone hit the nail on the head. Many projects in the crypto space rely on storytelling to raise funds, but no one uses them, and the tokens become worthless. The ones that truly survive are those with real products and cash flow, isn't that obvious?
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChillvip
· 01-18 16:28
After all this talk, it still comes down to having real users and being able to make money. No matter how fancy the packaging, it's all in vain. That's how the crypto world is—constantly hyping concepts, but basically just these two tricks.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Brovip
· 01-18 16:24
That's correct, but most projects fail because of these two issues, and they're still shouting about airdrops.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin