Don't be fooled by this kind of certainty. Global liquidity is indeed important, and there's no denying that. But ETH/BTC won't skyrocket just because a certain M2 chart looks good on social media. Historically, major moves in ETH/BTC have occurred in the following situations: when the liquidity environment significantly improves, when ETH has a clear ecological or technological narrative advantage over other assets, and when large-capital preparations are underway. Looking at macro indicators alone is not enough; it’s necessary to consider real factors like on-chain activity and ecosystem development progress to judge the future trend. A simple chart that looks good is far from enough to drive the explosion of assets at this scale.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiHeir
· 01-21 15:05
Charts looking good ≠ the price of the coin looking good. Why does this need to be explained repeatedly?
View OriginalReply0
ContractHunter
· 01-21 08:31
Ha, here comes another wave of chart enthusiasts, I really can't hold it anymore
---
This thing looks sexy but useless, on-chain real data is king
---
Well said, how many people were fooled by M2, and now they’re still cutting losses
---
The key is still who is building, who is buying, just looking at line charts is really… too naive
---
It’s always like this, macro narratives flood in, then reality slaps you in the face
---
Exactly, those without ecosystem support are all fake, don’t be brainwashed by those pretty curves
---
On-chain activity is real gold and silver, everything else is just storytelling
---
I really want to know, who is truly lurking in this wave, not just shouting slogans
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 01-19 07:51
Looking at a bunch of M2 charts and starting to sleepwalk, wake up already.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 01-18 15:59
Back to chart topology? The logic that M2 rises must mean ETH rises is really absurd.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSherpa
· 01-18 15:53
look, everyone's obsessed with that m2 chart thing but like... empirically speaking, eth/btc doesn't just pump off vibes and pretty graphs. if you actually examine the data historically, the real moves happen when you've got actual on-chain activity backing it up, not just macro indicators looking neat on twitter
Reply0
LuckyHashValue
· 01-18 15:51
People who want to go all-in just because the chart looks good need to wake up; I've seen this trick too many times.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKey
· 01-18 15:48
Sorry, a pretty chart ≠ money coming in. This principle needs to be repeated again and again.
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuth
· 01-18 15:43
Another one that tells stories with charts—what about real on-chain data?
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStriker
· 01-18 15:41
Another bunch of macro enthusiasts are there hyping up the market. Just because M2 looks good doesn't mean it will rise? Wake up.
Don't be fooled by this kind of certainty. Global liquidity is indeed important, and there's no denying that. But ETH/BTC won't skyrocket just because a certain M2 chart looks good on social media. Historically, major moves in ETH/BTC have occurred in the following situations: when the liquidity environment significantly improves, when ETH has a clear ecological or technological narrative advantage over other assets, and when large-capital preparations are underway. Looking at macro indicators alone is not enough; it’s necessary to consider real factors like on-chain activity and ecosystem development progress to judge the future trend. A simple chart that looks good is far from enough to drive the explosion of assets at this scale.