Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
What is the cost of trust in traditional finance? Lawyers, auditors, custodians—each link in the chain conducting due diligence—ultimately all need to be reflected in the balance sheet—those "compliance and audit expenses" are enough to deter small and medium-sized assets. The issue isn't whether to trust or not, but whether the way trust is produced can be fundamentally changed.
Dusk Network's actions over the past two years are essentially answering this question. Its three-layer architecture design, especially the combination of DuskEVM and Hedger engine, is fundamentally building an "automatic trust factory." Tasks that previously required months of manual verification—such as whether a transaction breaches regulatory red lines or whether asset transfers exceed permissions—are now automatically verified using cryptographic proofs.
The collaboration with NPEX is particularly interesting. Think about it—assets like tokenized securities (RWA) on the Dusk protocol layer, where compliance becomes a directly programmable and composable property. The costs for asset issuers and trading platforms to produce "trustworthy proofs" are drastically reduced. This is no small matter—it's a fundamental change to the cost structure of the entire RWA market.
More importantly, the mainnet upgrade is imminent. Once developers can directly invoke these built-in compliance and privacy modules within a convenient EVM environment, a wave of new financial applications will emerge. These applications will be built from day one on a low-cost, verifiable trust foundation—something unimaginable in traditional finance.
What is the value captured by the DUSK token? In essence, it is the entire value flow brought by this "new paradigm of trust production." It pays for the network's security and consensus, which means that all future low-cost, trustworthy financial activities built on this will have their value flow into it.
So, perhaps Dusk's story isn't just about privacy, but about a more fundamental matter: using cryptography and blockchain to turn the most expensive infrastructure in the financial world—trust—into something like electricity. Programmable, measurable, and low-cost. This is the true scope of the entire imagination.
Cryptography automatically executing regulatory logic? It sounds a bit crazy, but if it can really be implemented, it will change the game.
Will any project dare to do this after the mainnet upgrade, or is it just talk on paper...
I haven't considered the angle of low-cost trust infrastructure, but it still depends on whether real applications can get off the ground.
The narrative about DUSK really convinced me, but I'm worried it's just another storytelling expert.
When RWA is in full swing, can the cost advantage translate into real competitiveness? That's the key.
Partnering with NPEX sounds good; how much cost can it actually save? Are there any data?
The overall idea is clear, but I wonder if users will buy into it and if the project team can deliver.
The analogy of trust turning into electricity is interesting, but electricity also requires infrastructure maintenance. How does DUSK handle this?
Now I just look forward to the real data after the mainnet launch—don't just talk about visions.
---
Dusk's cryptography automation is really impressive, directly bringing lawyers and auditors' jobs onto the chain.
---
Wow, if RWA really takes off, how many projects will need to be rewritten?
---
Basically, they want to cut out intermediaries in TradFi, but can they really do it completely?
---
Regarding mainnet upgrades, let's wait and see if it can truly attract developers. It's too early to say anything now.
---
Will DUSK be the next token to be drained by the ecosystem? Let's wait and see.
---
Cryptographic proofs replacing manual review? Sounds sci-fi, but what about in practice?
---
The costs for RWA have been reduced, but who bears the responsibility for compliance?
---
Halving compliance costs is not a dream; RWA is really about to take off.
---
Wait, can DuskEVM really automatically perform all compliance checks? Are there any risks, brother?
---
Why is there still no news about the mainnet upgrade? We need to get on board quickly.
---
Using cryptography as electricity, sounds great but what about the reality...
---
Is the NPEX partnership hinting at something? Feels like there's a play.
---
If this logic holds, the token's value potential is truly terrifying.
---
It's not about privacy but trust production. Alright, I believe your narrative this time.
---
Lawyer and audit fees are indeed exorbitant; they should be eliminated.
---
Calling compliance modules in the EVM environment sounds so comfortable. When will it go live?
Only when the mainnet is truly launched will there be something to play with in the RWA sector.
Whether DUSK can become a key player still depends on whether developers are willing to accept it.
The mainnet upgrade is coming, will the developer ecosystem take off immediately then?
If DUSK can truly turn trust into infrastructure... then the value capture logic becomes very clear.
I'm a bit curious whether this NPEX partnership will become the catalyst for RWA explosion.
Cryptographic proof of automatic execution still has some potential, saving those audit lawyers several months of work.
It feels like the entire imagination space has opened up, just waiting to see how the mainnet upgrade will be implemented.
Has the mainnet gone live? It's not too late to wait and see before bragging...
But honestly, the cost of RWA is indeed a big chunk. If it can be really reduced, it would be interesting.
Wait a minute, so in the end, it still depends on whether DUSK can catch this wave of narrative?
Automatic trust factories sound good, but how will it actually be implemented? Trust the market to decide.
Honestly, I didn’t see this move from DUSK coming. Using cryptography as the trust infrastructure sounds a bit like a fairy tale, but the logic does hold up.
It mainly depends on whether the mainnet upgrade can truly be delivered. We'll see how the developers respond.
RWA is currently being held back by these compliance costs. If it can truly be programmed with attributes, I think there could be some big moves.
I have some reservations about the future value flow of the DUSK token. The premise is that the application really needs to take off first.
After the mainnet upgrade, interesting things should emerge, but the key still depends on whether there are people in the ecosystem truly building these applications.
The RWA (Real World Assets) area indeed presents opportunities, but how much the NPEX collaboration can actually be implemented remains to be seen. It might look impressive on paper but not much in reality.
Cryptographic proofs replacing manual verification is a good idea, but the concern is that it might be overhyped and ultimately deliver less than expected.
Whether DUSK can capitalize on this wave of benefits depends on adoption; technology alone is useless.
I agree with the narrative of low-cost trust, but whether the valuation can support this imagination space is hard to say.
Has the mainnet upgrade date been set? I always feel that deadlines for projects like this tend to be missed.
It's nice to call it a "trust factory," but in less flattering terms, it's just automated intermediaries. Can it truly revolutionize the financial system? I'm skeptical.