2026-01-18 15:24:30

Have you noticed that the privacy protection track is still in its very early stages? I’ve been paying attention to this direction and would like to share my thoughts with everyone.

Honestly, projects like DUSK really stand out in their approach. They focus their energy on technological development rather than constantly marketing and creating hype, which is quite rare in the crypto space. While most projects are rushing to raise funds, they are dedicated to optimizing their products. The difference is quite significant.

My personal judgment is that in the next few years, the demand for privacy will shift from optional to essential—similar to the significance of HTTPS for the internet back in the day, eventually becoming a fundamental infrastructure. When users truly realize how dangerous unencrypted financial transactions are, market demand will explode. If DUSK can make the user experience sufficiently foolproof, it has a real chance to become a leader in this track.

Of course, I’m not saying everyone should go all-in; I just think the current prices are relatively affordable in terms of cost. During the volatility of mainstream coins like BTC, some technical projects are actually worth long-term positioning. There are too many speculators in this field, and those who genuinely focus on technology tend to stand out more easily.

In summary, I plan to continue paying attention to and holding onto this sector, and I also hope to see more innovative technical teams rise in this track.

DUSK-0,51%

BTC-0,33%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

quiet_lurker

· 01-21 15:20

The more early projects I look at, the more I feel that most are just air. Projects like DUSK that truly focus on doing the work are actually rare. I am also observing. This type of privacy track will eventually become standard; it just depends on who can survive until that day. But honestly, the current price is still a bit high. Let's wait a bit longer. If DUSK can really improve its UX, it will win, but is this guy reliable? Early-stage tracks are always like this; who will ultimately succeed is still unknown. Projects that focus on technical development are indeed easy to overlook, but their long-term value is greater. It's still too early to go all-in on privacy projects. Your analysis is quite good, but is there still a chance in this cycle? Privacy infrastructure is definitely the future, but I worry DUSK might die before dawn. Having faith in holding is fine, but don’t get caught in a trap. The biggest risk for these projects is that no one will use them after the technology is completed. The HTTPS analogy is good, but how long will it take for encrypted finance to adopt privacy? Anyway, I’m waiting for the market to heat up before taking action. For now, I’m observing.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalDetective

· 01-21 09:30

Indeed, the privacy track is still a blue ocean, but the prerequisite is having a team that is truly working on it. I took a look at the DUSK team, and I appreciate that they are not just following the hype with marketing, but I’m just worried that their subsequent progress might be too slow. Early-stage projects do have relatively low costs, but the problem is how many can survive until they reach a breakout. In contrast, those who boast every day end up becoming weed-cutting machines, and the stark contrast is quite ironic.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 01-19 10:40

according to my behavioral finance thesis on privacy coin adoption curves, the memetic velocity of "actually building vs shilling" creates statistically significant alpha... ngl tho this DUSK pitch hits different bc nobody's running the numbers on real tech fundamentals anymore 📊

Reply0

MemeCurator

· 01-18 15:52

Early-stage tracks are indeed more likely to produce dark horses; it all depends on who genuinely focuses on technology. I like the low-key, big-profit style like DUSK, which is much more reliable than projects that constantly PR. Privacy will be a necessity sooner or later, and the current entry cost is still acceptable. Speaking of which, truly dedicated product developers in the crypto space are rare gems. This price positioning feels like a long-term advantage; anyway, during BTC fluctuations, technical coins are also worth accumulating at the bottom.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 01-18 15:52

Talking about privacy coins gives me a headache. This stuff needs market education. Wait, is DUSK really working on something seriously, or is it the usual story? Good grief, another HTTPS analogy. I've seen this pitch several times on forums. Now, entering early projects isn't without risks. Who knows if it will become the next zero-value coin? But on the other hand, truly technical teams can easily get drowned out by marketing noise.

View OriginalReply0

CommunitySlacker

· 01-18 15:48

Hmm... The privacy track is indeed still early, but DUSK has been around for so long, why hasn't it taken off yet? I've seen people working on the technology for a while, but honestly, projects like these in the crypto space are often overlooked. I've heard the analogy of HTTPS several times; it's hard to say how likely it is to succeed. The price is cheap, but for long-term holding, you need to be mentally prepared for this kind of thing. --- Why do I feel like these kinds of projects always die at the user education stage? --- I agree that privacy is a future necessity, but the reality is most people don't care about privacy or lack awareness. --- It's easy to say but hard to do; I haven't seen a truly usable, foolproof privacy product yet. --- I'm optimistic about technical projects in the long run, but the premise is not to run away; there are too many dead projects in the crypto space. --- Wait, what's the current price of DUSK? I think I missed something.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 01-18 15:48

The logic of privacy tracks shifting from optional to mandatory indeed makes sense, similar to how HTTPS hit the right spot. However, the key to ROI still depends on whether the team can reduce complexity and find the right balance between computational costs and user experience... this is very critical.

View OriginalReply0