Canada has set a less-than-glorious record — net immigration has turned negative for the first time. This is the first time since 1852 that such data has been recorded.



According to the latest data from Statistics Canada, the population actually declined by 0.2% in the third quarter of 2025. The main driver behind this is a significant decrease in the number of non-permanent residents, which dropped by 176,500. To ease the housing crisis and social service pressures, the government directly cut back on immigration targets — the permanent resident goal was halved from 500,000 to 395,000, and temporary resident quotas were reduced from 670,000 to 385,000.

It sounds like a move to control the situation, but it might have gone too far. Population growth has fallen to its lowest post-war level, and the workforce continues to age, posing long-term risks to economic growth. Between July and September 2025, Canada also saw a net loss of 40,000 jobs, indicating the labor market is under pressure.

From a regional competition perspective, this policy adjustment weakens Canada's competitiveness in attracting North American talent, while increasing the relative attractiveness of the US tech and financial sectors. But don’t jump to conclusions — as Canada's second-largest trading partner, the slowdown in its economy will inevitably ripple through supply chains and impact certain US industries. Overall, the impact on US stocks is mildly positive, mainly benefiting industries with high demand for skilled labor.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Gm_Gn_Merchantvip
· 01-20 23:02
Bro, now Canada has really shot itself in the foot. Net immigration turning negative? That's a bold move, talent is all rushing to the US. Halting immigration quotas, yet the population actually declines—can this logic be clarified... Aging workforce is a ticking time bomb; Canada is shooting itself in the foot. Basically, it's an overcorrection in policy; it's too late to regret now. The US stock market has some small positive signals, but Canada is indeed hurt. In the long run, the Canadian dollar will face pressure; the cost of this decision is quite high. Sorry for going off-topic, but speaking of the talent war in North America, the US is completely winning effortlessly.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavantvip
· 01-19 19:39
ngl canada really said "let's speedrun demographic collapse" 💀 net negative migration since 1852? that's not just a policy L, that's a statistical anomaly waiting to wreck their labor force thesis... the copium about "controlling the situation" when they're literally losing 40k jobs quarterly is peak academic delusion fr fr
Reply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 01-18 20:38
Canada's recent moves are truly heartbreaking; the cuts are so harsh that they're shooting themselves in the foot. Negative population growth combined with an aging workforce will definitely impact the economy in the long run, while the US is actually benefiting from it. It seems policymakers haven't thought things through before starting to cut. Canadian tech talent in Silicon Valley is probably about to start a mass exodus, which might actually be good for the North American supply chain? Quite ironic. A population decline is the real warning signal; it's not good news.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 01-18 14:59
Cutting immigration quotas only backfires and shoots oneself in the foot. This move is truly brilliant. Negative population growth combined with aging, Canada is committing suicide. Everyone has gone to the US. What's left behind? The pension black hole of an aging society. I just want to know who made this brainless decision—failing to solve the housing crisis and instead driving people away. Good grief, I've never seen anything this absurd since 1852. This data should be written into textbooks.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-18 14:55
Wow, Canada, this is a suicidal policy. Forcing people out can even lead to economic problems.
View OriginalReply0
GasBankruptervip
· 01-18 14:54
Canada's current moves are truly suicidal. No wonder everyone is fleeing to the US. Stalling immigration is equivalent to stalling your own future. The aging population is a pit that can't be dug out. Net immigration turning negative? That's so absurd. If the supply chain breaks, can US stocks still rise? Canada is now in a state of chronic self-destruction. Talent outflow makes US stocks more attractive, how ironic. Negative population growth and still trying to sustain the economy? Dream on. Long-term bearishness is already locked in.
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeachervip
· 01-18 14:52
Canada's recent moves have truly shot themselves in the foot—reducing immigration is actually accelerating the population crisis?
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 01-18 14:51
Sigh, this policy is really unpredictable. It loosened initially and now is suddenly hitting the brakes... Speaking of talent fleeing to the US, it's actually an invisible positive for tech stocks. Canada's recent moves are a bit hasty; it feels like they're digging their own grave. When will the aging crisis be resolved? Simply cutting quotas definitely isn't a long-term solution. The US tech sector is about to benefit from this wave of dividends; I've been bullish on it for a while.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 01-18 14:45
Canada's recent moves have truly backfired, reducing immigration ended up digging a hole for themselves.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollectorvip
· 01-18 14:36
Canada's recent moves are indeed a bit rushed; they lack manpower. The selling pressure was too great, so they directly cut immigration quotas. Now, on the flip side, with an aging workforce and the slowest economic growth since the post-war period... aren't they digging their own grave? Over in the US, they are actually benefiting, as talent is fleeing south. The population turning negative for the first time since 1852—what does that mean? The aftermath of policy adjustments is not insignificant. Short-term relief for housing pressures, but long-term economic risks are buried deep. Canada's overall strategy is a bit chaotic... --- This is a classic case of treating the symptoms rather than the root cause; now it's too late to regret. --- Wait, does this really bode well for the US stock market? That depends on the industries—those with strong appeal to high-end talent will definitely benefit. --- After all this fuss, Canada has actually pushed people to the US. What kind of policy is this?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin