2026-01-18 14:27:03

Recently, many people have been sharing how to participate in this activity. After all, it’s a product launched by a well-known industry team, and I always feel like there’s something to be mined. But the more I look at it, the more I feel something’s off.

Invitation codes, basic subsidies, trading competition points... all kinds of setups, looking exactly like a project from a few years ago. What’s more exaggerated is that this time they’ve directly opened up the calculation of trading volume for stablecoin刷量.

This is very interesting. We all know that the matching costs on different public chains are there—some have a 0.1% fee, others 0.2%. But now? There’s no need to consider that at all. You can just use USDT or USDC to刷量 back and forth between your own wallets, and in an afternoon, you can pile up millions in trading volume. And this calculation is very clear, transparent to the extreme.

In comparison, if you want to刷量 through perpetual contracts or other derivatives? That’s much more complicated. Funding rates, slippage, real counterparties... there are too many factors, and the costs are higher. So many people just give up on that.

But because the stablecoin route is so straightforward, it actually leaves me a bit confused. What’s the difficulty of this game? The basic competitiveness? It all seems to be flattened out. To put it simply, whoever has more principal wins—it's that simple and brutal.

There have been projects that did this before, but they took a very aggressive fee cut, so profit margins were limited. This time, it seems like there’s no such hurdle. So the question is—how should we play this game? Should we really go all out to刷量, or wait to see how they adjust later? I’m a bit curious if they might change the rules halfway through.

USDC-0,01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerumSquirter

· 01-21 09:12

This routine is so familiar, I've seen it several times in the past two years. Every time they say something different, but it's just a repackage. The fact that the stablecoin is so open to刷, it feels a bit too defenseless, which actually makes people feel uneasy. Honestly, with rules like "who has more money wins," the game loses its meaning. Purely competing with capital is a bit boring. Without transaction fees, either they have other tricks that haven't been revealed yet, or they really want to attract people with money, betting that they can take over later. I'm holding a wait-and-see attitude, first watching if big players really start投入, then deciding whether to follow the trend and刷.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-21 07:43

I've seen this routine too many times, just changing the shell to keep scamming. Are there really no people blocking such obvious vulnerabilities in stablecoin attacks? --- Is it true that having more principal means winning? Feels like playing big fish eating small fish, not interesting. --- Wait, this rule is too transparent, so transparent that it feels a bit unreal. --- I bet 5 bucks that this project will change the rules halfway through. Don’t ask me how I know. --- Honestly, I feel a bit cowardly, not daring to go all in. After all, the last few activities like this always ended in losses. --- There really are no transaction fees? Then who is making money? Or is it that the bigger the principal, the more likely they are to profit? --- It looks profitable but I always feel like I’ll get cut, this feeling is uncomfortable. --- Well-known industry teams also dare to play like this, the bottom line is really getting lower and lower. --- Instead of trying to push all out, it’s better to observe for a few days first. These activities often have very different rules in the early and late stages.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-21 06:33

ngl this smells like someone left the grimoire wide open... stablecoin alchemy with zero friction? that's not alpha brewing, that's just capital worship disguised as a game. whoever designed this either doesn't understand protocol mechanics or knows exactly what they're doing—pick your poison

Reply0

BearMarketGardener

· 01-19 23:03

This trick is becoming more and more obvious, it feels like there's no technical content, just拼本金. Let's wait and see, changing rules midway through such activities is a common practice. It's really a game for big players, small investors are just a backdrop. Who dares to go all in? The risk is ridiculously high. Seeing this transparency actually makes it seem more dangerous. With the fee hurdle gone, I trust it even less. The lessons from the past are still fresh in my mind, why would this time be any different? Basically, it's about who has more money in their account, nothing else. It's better to wait for the second wave to get in, at least the rules will be clearer.

View OriginalReply0

GasWhisperer

· 01-18 14:56

bruh the stablecoin wash game really said "remove all friction points" huh... watching the gwei patterns on this one and ngl it feels like someone accidentally left the mempool wide open. usually there's *some* cost optimization hurdle but here? just pure capital arbitrage theatre. kinda beautiful in a degenerate way tbh

Reply0

MevWhisperer

· 01-18 14:55

Isn't this just an old trick in new clothing, with such an open stance on stablecoin trading? It feels like they're leaving a foreshadowing for a rule change at some point.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-18 14:54

It's the same old trick again. Stablecoin staking directly removes the threshold, feeling like playing Monopoly—whoever has more money wins. Honestly, this feels exactly like that project from two years ago. Now we're just waiting to see if the team will change the rules halfway through. It's better to play it safe than to gamble. Principal game, no suspense. The unpredictable losses are even less straightforward than this... The fee hurdle is gone, but it feels even more unsettling, like it's too good to be true. Major investors are probably quietly cashing out already, while we're still figuring out how to participate. The gap is huge... Come on, can someone tell me how exactly the protocol's fees are calculated? It feels like all the suspense has been drained. It looks like a chance to scalp some profits, but it might actually be a big trap. I'm deciding to wait and see. It's that kind of "high yield, low risk" marketing again. This time, I've learned my lesson—I'll see if there's any project still alive after three months.

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAllDay

· 01-18 14:54

Isn't this just the old trick of changing skins? The way stablecoins are being openly manipulated feels like fishing. As long as you have principal, you can sit back and win? Then I’d better wait and see. These projects change rules faster than changing pants. Honestly, without the hurdle of transaction fees, it’s even more frightening. It feels like something’s going to go wrong. Never go all out; nine times out of ten, you'll get cut.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 01-18 14:38

I've played this trick before, and it's indeed a bit outrageous for stablecoins to be so blatant about刷量. It's just a game of拼资金量, pointless. --- The project from two years ago scammed some people like this, and now they're back? I don't believe they'll change the rules. --- Wow, they directly give the green light to刷量, how confident are they? Feels like there will definitely be a reversal later. --- Basically, it's about who has more money. This isn't a trading competition; it's clearly a抢钱大赛. --- Let's wait and see. Projects like this often change the rules halfway through, and in the end, it's still retail investors who lose. --- It's outrageous that they haven't taken a high cut in手续费; they're definitely harvesting in other places. I bet five bucks on it. --- Invitation codes, subsidies, trading competitions... same old tricks, no real change. --- If you ask me, just watch and see. The information leaked out is a bit too "friendly," there must be a trap. --- With such low成本 for stablecoin刷量, does the industry team really dare to do this? Doesn't feel right. --- If having more本金 means winning, then why participate? Just go all in, right? The logic is broken.

View OriginalReply0

notSatoshi1971

· 01-18 14:27

Damn, I saw through this trick at a glance, it's basically a copy-paste of that project from last year. The way they are blatantly attacking stablecoins feels a bit too disrespectful.

View OriginalReply0