A certain project has covered an airdrop plan for over 4,000 active addresses, with each active address receiving a $1 reward. From a mechanism design perspective, this kind of broad-based incentivization approach lacks technical barriers and innovation—it's basically throwing money to exchange for user data. Although the low participation threshold can quickly accumulate address numbers, such airdrop logic often has limited effectiveness and makes it difficult to establish genuine user stickiness and ecological value. In contrast, more competitive projects usually set up tiered incentives, task-related rewards, or community governance participation to reflect the true value of Web3.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterNoLossvip
· 01-20 10:12
A $1 Airdrop to 4000 addresses, isn't this just paying for data... --- Same old trick, throwing money to increase address count, waiting to be exploited --- Real Web3 projects have long been implementing layered incentives, but this is still stuck in place --- Low-threshold airdrops seem great, but in reality, it's just a waste of money with zero stickiness --- No innovation in mechanisms, relying on throwing money to pile up users, how far this project can go is really uncertain --- Just giving money without value, you really don't understand the essence of Web3 --- 4000 addresses sound like a lot, but how many will actually stay? Basically, it's a bunch of worthless stuff --- This gameplay is too old-fashioned, the market is already tired of it --- Using money to buy addresses is overused, why isn't there any creativity? --- Not interested in deep community engagement, only wanting to quickly boost numbers, destined to be a flash in the pan
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologistvip
· 01-20 05:52
Spending 4000 yuan to get 4000 addresses, is this the Web3 innovation? Truly laughable.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobbervip
· 01-18 14:55
It's the same old trick of cutting leeks again, 4000 addresses for $1? Laughing out loud, do they really think we're that stupid?
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshivip
· 01-18 14:52
Spending money to buy data, this trick has really become all too common.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEyevip
· 01-18 14:48
Another one of those flood-style airdrops, really pointless.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoyvip
· 01-18 14:27
$1 for 4,000 addresses? This is what Web3 looks like now... Throwing money to pile up data, anyone can do it, no technical skill required. Another airdrop show-off project, next one. Real interesting projects can't even use this trick. This model is so common now, still expecting stickiness? Haha.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin