Want to quickly judge if a Web3 project is reliable? There's a super simple method—compare it to the risk-free rate.



What is the risk-free rate? Simply put: the return you can get without doing anything. The current market situation is like this—U.S. Treasury bonds are stable at 4%-5%, and the actual yield of high-quality stablecoins is also around 4%-6%. This line is the passing threshold set by the market for all investments.

Conversely, if a project’s long-term return is only about 5%, why would you gamble on volatility, exit risks, liquidation risks, and regulatory risks? It’s simply not worth it.

Let’s look at what history tells us. During the 2021-2022 wave, DeFi projects wildly promised 50%, 100%, even 300% APY. But what was the result? The returns relied entirely on token hyperinflation, with real cash flow close to zero. When token prices fell, these figures collapsed immediately. Real returns? -20%, -50%, and in severe cases, -90%. These projects never even reached the passing line.

Later, these projects changed their pitch: "Stable 8%-12% annualized." Celsius and BlockFi used this line to attract funds, but both eventually collapsed. The problem is straightforward—when the risk-free rate is only 3%, why would they stably offer me 10%? Mathematically, it simply doesn’t add up.

So, returning to the starting point: the first step of any investment is to beat the risk-free rate. If you can’t get past this hurdle, all subsequent promises are empty talk. Those projects offering returns worse than government bonds but with risks that are wildly higher—what exactly are they selling?
DEFI-4,03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityNinjavip
· 01-20 02:02
The risk-free rate benchmark is truly outstanding, directly exposing the superficiality of those projects.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiacvip
· 01-19 05:14
This set of logic is actually Mechanism Design 101—Incentive Compatibility Verification. I can see clearly that Celsius's entire business model cannot withstand mathematical scrutiny and relies on FOMO to take over. To put it simply, the risk-free rate is the lower bound; anything that promises excess returns but cannot break through this lower bound will inevitably have governance issues.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.ethvip
· 01-18 22:11
Damn, I really fell into the trap with Celsius and BlockFi. I only just now understand the idea of risk-free interest rates.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityWorkervip
· 01-18 14:53
Really, Celsius still haven't learned their lesson. Now there's another project claiming a 15% stable return, and I just laugh.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 01-18 14:46
That's so true. I've been using this logic all along, saving so many detours.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChainvip
· 01-18 14:37
That's a bit too straightforward. The risk-free rate is indeed a mirror that reveals the true nature of projects that boast excessively; once compared, their true form is exposed.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlastsvip
· 01-18 14:33
To be honest, you really need to keep a close eye on the risk-free rate line and not be fooled by those persuasive words.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 01-18 14:28
ngl the math on those "stable 8-12%" schemes still haunts me... saw celsius collapse in real time and people still fall for it lmaooo
Reply0
JustAnotherWalletvip
· 01-18 14:28
Basically, it's about whether the APY exceeds the risk-free rate. Projects that can't surpass it are simply not worth touching.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin