2026-01-17 16:20:38

#比特币2026年行情展望 The US banking industry is opening its doors to embrace crypto payments — this news is truly significant.

Once the entire banking system supports digital asset settlement, the improvement of infrastructure will directly bridge the final mile between traditional finance and Web3. This policy shift often triggers a chain reaction in the market.

Some analysts believe that as compliance infrastructure is strengthened, $BTC could surge to $200,000 by 2026. Mechanistically, the support from banks will significantly lower the entry barrier for ordinary users, and this increased adoption has historically supported higher price expectations.

Of course, all of this depends on the strength of policy implementation and actual market feedback. But regardless, this step marks a subtle change in the attitude of traditional finance towards digital assets.

BTC4,3%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SoliditySurvivor

· 01-20 15:16

Bank supporting crypto payments? This is really no small matter. Once the infrastructure is in place, there's no turning back.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeNomad

· 01-20 13:29

ngl the infrastructure argument sounds clean on paper, but has anyone actually mapped out the counter-party risk here? banks touching crypto = new attack vectors we haven't stress-tested yet. seen this movie before with cross-chain bridges lol

Reply0

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 01-19 10:07

Is the banking system really embracing crypto? $200,000 sounds pretty crazy, but if the infrastructure is truly in place... it's not impossible.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 01-17 16:50

The idea of banks accepting crypto payments... sounds great, but I have to pour cold water on it. A well-developed infrastructure ≠ perfect security; these are two different things. Just look at the vulnerabilities exploited in those large cross-chain bridges before—slightly lax permission controls can lead to catastrophic failures. I don't oppose the expectation of @USD20@ million, but the prerequisite is that the smart contracts of these banking systems can withstand formal verification—reality is, most of them haven't. Policy attitude may shift, and adoption may increase, but before users get involved, they should ask: Have these payment channel contracts been audited? Are protections against re-entrancy attacks in place? Don't end up with another big news story.

View OriginalReply0

MaticHoleFiller

· 01-17 16:47

Bank involvement can really move the market, but whether the 200,000 will be effective depends on how much the policy pushes forward. It still feels a bit too idealistic.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 01-17 16:45

The entry of banks into this field... The polite way to say it is that the infrastructure is being improved; the less polite way is that it's another round of squeezing the retail investors. 200,000? Heh, let's see the execution first.

View OriginalReply0

SybilSlayer

· 01-17 16:36

The bank's move is really quite aggressive; it seems traditional finance truly can't sit still anymore.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 01-17 16:30

Another 200,000, come on. The bank probably needs to wait a bit longer before fully rolling out.

View OriginalReply0

PerennialLeek

· 01-17 16:28

Banks have finally woken up, 200,000 USD? I just want to ask when I can directly withdraw coins from the ATM downstairs of my building.

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 01-17 16:23

Banks "opening their doors"? Ha, let's look at the on-chain data first. Lowering the entry barrier for ordinary users = retail investors' exit strategy, I've seen this trick before. The $200,000 price expectation is way too smooth; where's the linearity in capital games?

View OriginalReply0