2026-01-17 15:28:23

The Snowball project has recently shown resilience in the face of market downturns, primarily due to its design mechanism. Each transaction incurs a 3% slippage, and when the accumulated amount reaches 0.1BNB, the system automatically triggers a buyback and burn, creating continuous deflationary pressure. The project is officially launched by the team and has no sovereign affiliation. Long-term development of the Chinese community both online and offline is also underway. Compared to similar projects that ride the hype, this combination—robust mechanism plus community operation—truly supports stronger price resilience. While it has led the short-term gains, the key is whether the community enthusiasm can be converted into sustainable ecosystem support.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MerkleTreeHugger

· 01-20 15:14

The mechanism is indeed solid; I'm just worried it won't hold up once the hype cools down.

View OriginalReply0

Web3Educator

· 01-20 14:37

ngl the 3% slippage auto-burn mechanism is lowkey genius... but let me break this down for you—fundamentally speaking, this is just deflationary tokenomics 101. seen my students make the same bet a hundred times, some moon, most don't lmao

Reply0

RamenDeFiSurvivor

· 01-19 11:40

The mechanism is indeed solid, but whether the community can really stick with it is the key. --- 3% slippage + automatic burn, I support this logic, just worried that the hype will fade away. --- Resilience to downturns is a fact, but don't mistake resilience for risk resistance; it still depends on how the subsequent ecosystem develops. --- I value the lack of sovereignty attribution more; at least I'm not afraid of large holders dumping. --- The community operation is hyped up, let's wait and see what the actual conversion rate is. --- The core mechanism itself is not new; the key is whether users are willing to stick around and play.

View OriginalReply0

Alex王哥

· 01-17 18:46

Snowball, you profit by selling it with a 1% fee. Shorting it incurs a terrifyingly high funding rate. You profit from both ends. The funding rate is calculated hourly. Plus, it has no spot anchoring. Purely a leek harvesting machine. Cherish life, stay away from Snowball.

View OriginalReply0

DomineeringExposed

· 01-17 15:56

A 6% fee on both buy and sell transactions? Oh my god, that's just robbery.

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 01-17 15:53

Honestly, it depends on how long the 3% slippage mechanism can last. Stop bragging; the real test is still to come. The solid mechanism is good, but I'm worried that the community enthusiasm will burn out. Chinese community building? There are too many projects I've heard of; let's wait and see. The mechanism is well-designed, but whether it can hold up is the key. Deflation is deflation, but the main thing is to have enough popularity to support it.

View OriginalReply0

blocksnark

· 01-17 15:46

This mechanism design does have some substance; the combination of deflation + buyback packs a pretty strong punch. Snowball's ability to resist declines mainly relies on solid mechanisms; other markets simply can't do that. Whether community enthusiasm can be converted into ecological support—that's the real key. To be honest, there are a bunch of projects with this kind of mechanism now, but few can execute it well. Wait, does the official no-sovereign setting mean there will be fewer variables moving forward? I can see that the Chinese community's operations are indeed putting in effort; this is much better than those free-range projects. A hard mechanism isn't万能; ultimately, it still depends on how long the team and community can坚持. It's somewhat interesting; let's keep an eye on the trend and see how it develops. In simple terms, it's a combination of mechanism + operations; this approach does have some novelty.

View OriginalReply0

ImperfectionIsWhatMak

· 01-17 15:42

Resilient to declines, not fully distributed yet, definitely won't drop sharply, and there are still people taking over.

View OriginalReply0

ImperfectionIsWhatMak

· 01-17 15:40

Laughing to death,

View OriginalReply0

BanklessAtHeart

· 01-17 15:29

A solid mechanism + community operation combination really works well; it's much more reliable than those vapor projects.