2026-01-16 05:27:10

I saw a pretty typical failure case—a meme coin project on BSC that initially gained great momentum. However, due to issues with the market-making fund chain, the husband-and-wife founders were directly criticized by netizens across the internet, and the entire platform's popularity instantly cooled down. Meanwhile, the original partner wallets even kicked them out, treating them as competitors.

This incident exposed a very real problem: without sufficient liquidity reserves, you shouldn't try to support multiple coin ecosystems at the same time. Market-making for a single coin is already extremely difficult, let alone maintaining five or six coins on some platforms. The funds simply can't support such operations.

Take a leading project as an example. They used to focus solely on building the ecosystem for one coin. Now that they've expanded to multiple coins, although their business lines seem more diverse, the pressure of market-making has also multiplied. Without real financial investment, it's a dead end. That's also why, during this bear market, those platforms eager for quick expansion are all falling behind.

MEME-3,96%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoWageSlave

· 01-18 15:03

Greedy fools deserve it. They can't even manage one coin properly and still want to operate five or six at the same time. Once the funding chain breaks, it's all over. I remember the couple who ran away, and there are still people whitewashing them… Forget it, I won't mention it. That's why I only focus on single-coin ecosystems now. Projects with multiple lines of development, I just pass. Trying to sustain with insufficient liquidity will eventually lead to a crash—that's the rule. There are too many collapse cases like this on BSC. Honestly, it was about time to clear them out.

View OriginalReply0

ChainComedian

· 01-16 20:57

The couple running away, I really can't smile about this wave. The BSC ecosystem is being ruined like this. Market making for five or six coins? Bro, are you joking? How can the funding chain support that? Honestly, it's still greed. Can't even do one coin well and insist on doing everything. No wonder you got kicked out of the wallet. That's why I only focus on single-coin ecosystem projects; the risk is much lower. In a bear market, these kinds of short-sighted schemes are eliminated. Forcing through with insufficient liquidity—what is this if not self-destructive? It seems that starting a crypto project is not as simple as it looks. Without real funds, don't mess around. This is how the slap in the face begins.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller69

· 01-16 05:57

Greedy and insatiable, the snake swallows the elephant, and here comes another one --- To be honest, this move is purely suicidal. The funding chain can't hold up and they still want to expand --- The biggest fear for a husband-and-wife project team is this—once something goes wrong, public opinion will explode --- Market making is a very risky game. Without real money backing, how can it be stable? --- Maintaining five or six coins at the same time? Are you out of your mind? In a bear market, you'll die even faster --- Why didn't anyone warn these project teams before? It's too late to regret now --- Kicked out of the wallet directly haha, this is what you call a domino effect --- Liquidity exhaustion is a ticking time bomb, it will explode sooner or later --- Top-tier projects also took some greed in this move, expanding too aggressively --- A dead end—these three words are harsh, but it's really time to wake up

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_vibing

· 01-16 05:52

Married couples directly became a negative example, a bit pitiful but also... deserved? Greed really can kill people --- Market makers for five or six coins? What are they thinking, once the funding chain breaks, their true nature immediately shows --- That's why I never touch platforms that expand too quickly, my wallet is already signaling to them that the signs are not obvious enough --- The bear market is the best time to see who is swimming naked; liquidity can't be hidden at all --- To put it simply, they still want to make quick money, but end up being painfully educated by the market

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 01-16 05:49

Married couple teams crashing is really the ultimate, once the funding chain breaks, it's all over. To put it simply, it's greed. Market making is already money-burning, and they still want to maintain five or six coins at once... aren't they asking for death? Liquidity exhaustion is the biggest killer in this round; I've seen too many projects like this. The consequences of rushing for quick gains are similar—look good for a few days and then go to zero. Why not learn from top projects and first stabilize one coin before expanding? Multi-chain deployment sounds glamorous, but in reality, the pressure is off the charts. Those who survive the bear market are the ones who stick to the fundamentals; those who want rapid expansion have already exited. If you don't have a solid funding chain, don't make reckless moves, or you'll end up with this outcome.

View OriginalReply0