In the world of fame and fortune,利益永远是第一位的. Projects like FORM, after fundraising, really treat big investors as their parents, but little do they know that users and the community are the true breadwinners. It is extremely rare to have an abundance of funds that cannot be used up; most project teams still rely on the community to survive.
Recent events clearly illustrate this point. BNX's series of actions have almost alienated the major funders, and during the Chinese AMA, someone asked why so many foreigners participated—asking such questions shows that the management has no sense of their community at all. Why would foreigners tune into a Chinese live stream? Isn't it because they have expectations for the project?
Last night's short position explosion has led some to suspect that insiders knew about the Butterfly incident in advance and acted accordingly. Behind this market phenomenon reflects the issues of opaque decision-making by the project team and declining trust with the community. Once support from major investors and the core community is lost, no matter how much money the project raises, it will be difficult to sustain.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
zkProofInThePudding
· 01-18 21:31
Really treating big investors as the God of Wealth, but not realizing that the community is the real financial backer.
---
BNX's move was truly brilliant. When asked why foreigners come to listen to Chinese AMA? It shows how little they understand their own market to ask such questions.
---
Releasing insider information to empty the short positions in advance—if this gets confirmed, it won't be long before a major crash occurs.
---
No matter how much money is raised, losing the community's trust is more deadly than anything else.
---
The consequence of project teams making opaque decisions is that players will run away, and it's hard to reverse that situation.
---
Prioritizing profits over everything else, and in the end, the community abandons you—this cycle should have been broken long ago.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 01-18 15:36
To be honest, this is the perfect opposite example of the supply and demand curve. After the project raises funds, they start "amnesia," forgetting who is the true price discoverer.
The AMA question about BNX made me laugh out loud. The management team probably has never heard of the basic common sense that "the market is global."
Losing the community = losing the floor price. No matter how much funding is raised, it can't be saved. It's that simple and straightforward.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 01-18 00:48
No matter how much money is raised, it can't save the management team's mess of bad debts.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 01-17 11:54
After funding, turning hostile is really unbelievable. What do you even consider the community to be?
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapist
· 01-16 05:54
Really, once the money is gone, everything floats away; the community is the real support.
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 01-16 05:46
They start giving the cold shoulder after funding, I'm tired of this routine.
BNX's move is truly outrageous; even the community members are confused about who they are.
That night when the short positions exploded, something felt off...
The project team really needs to wake up; no matter how much money they have, they can't buy back trust that has been broken.
Major investors have left, the community has dispersed, so what else is there to play with?
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoad
· 01-16 05:42
Basically, it's just shooting yourself in the foot. Raising so much money and still giving the community the cold shoulder.
View OriginalReply0
Gm_Gn_Merchant
· 01-16 05:31
Haha, the BNX move is really amazing. Even foreigners can't figure out why they're coming.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 01-16 05:31
Basically, it's just shooting yourself in the foot—after raising the money, they immediately turn hostile.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStation
· 01-16 05:26
This is a typical self-destruction; instead of shrinking, the money has inflated.
In the world of fame and fortune,利益永远是第一位的. Projects like FORM, after fundraising, really treat big investors as their parents, but little do they know that users and the community are the true breadwinners. It is extremely rare to have an abundance of funds that cannot be used up; most project teams still rely on the community to survive.
Recent events clearly illustrate this point. BNX's series of actions have almost alienated the major funders, and during the Chinese AMA, someone asked why so many foreigners participated—asking such questions shows that the management has no sense of their community at all. Why would foreigners tune into a Chinese live stream? Isn't it because they have expectations for the project?
Last night's short position explosion has led some to suspect that insiders knew about the Butterfly incident in advance and acted accordingly. Behind this market phenomenon reflects the issues of opaque decision-making by the project team and declining trust with the community. Once support from major investors and the core community is lost, no matter how much money the project raises, it will be difficult to sustain.