Moldova, a candidate country for the EU, has officially made a major move—Finance Minister Andrean Gavrilitsa recently announced that a new regulatory framework for crypto assets will be launched in 2026. This is not just talk; it aims to establish legal protections for the entire crypto market in accordance with EU MiCA regulations.
Sound exciting? Hold on, there are quite a few nuances:
**Legal but restricted in use.** Citizens can hold and trade cryptocurrencies with legal protections, but with a major caveat—you cannot use Bitcoin to buy coffee or settle payments with Ethereum. Imagine holding coins that you can't spend—how does that feel?
**Trading profits are taxable.** Holding cryptocurrencies itself is not taxed, but any profits earned must pay a 12% income tax. The government has made it clear: if you play, we get a share. This tax rate is relatively moderate compared to other European countries.
**Anti-money laundering and security controls are essential.** The government is determined to crack down on illegal financing and money laundering. Regulatory authorities will authorize specific institutions to operate, opening up the market while plugging loopholes through regulations.
Why is Moldova so proactive? Simply put, it’s preparing to join the EU. Before integrating into the EU market, it’s building a comprehensive local crypto regulatory system to better meet EU standards and expectations.
**The practical issue now:** Allow trading to generate profits, prohibit using cryptocurrencies as a means of payment, and still impose taxes—does this logic hold? Will this "open yet regulated" model become a template for other countries? Is a 12% tax rate acceptable to you, or do you find it a bit harsh?
Rather than saying it’s a liberalization, it’s more about precise balancing. Moldova chooses to let crypto operate in the sunlight rather than banning it outright or leaving it completely unregulated. This approach might inspire other countries that are still hesitating.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller
· 01-19 05:25
Can't spend the coins in hand? Isn't this just the "legal tender" I mentioned last time in a certain group haha
Another European country playing word games, basically just wanting tax and regulatory control
12% is okay, much more relaxed than the Americans, but banning payments is really the ultimate move
After Moldova's combined approach, it feels like a bunch of countries will follow suit
This is exactly what the government wants—being able to claim openness while covering all risks, smart indeed
Wait, if you can't spend the coins, what's the point of holding them? How does this logic even make sense?
Looks like a tailor-made template framework for the EU, Moldova is just a training partner
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 01-19 01:34
You can't spend the coins in your hand, isn't this just electronic collectibles? LOL
If it can be traded, it can be cashed out. The 12% tax rate is actually quite reasonable, much more considerate than some countries.
Moldova's approach is clever—first meet EU standards, then proceed. Other countries can only follow suit.
Basically, they want the cake and to control the temperature at the same time. This balancing act isn't easy.
Is 12% really a loss? Just look at how Singapore and Switzerland handle it, and you'll see clearly.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 01-16 05:55
Holding coins in your hand but unable to spend them—this is like the financial version of Schrödinger's cat, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 01-16 05:55
Can't spend your coins in hand? This setting is ridiculous; it's better to just ban it outright.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 01-16 05:46
Holding coins and not being able to spend them, isn't that just putting us in a golden handcuff? That's hilarious.
Really? A 12% tax is considered moderate? Then how high must it be in other European countries?
Moldova's move is actually just trying to integrate crypto into the EU. Clever, yes, but this framework is truly awkward.
Allowing trading but banning payments—this logic is basically capital operation. It's obvious the government wants a share.
Wait, for anti-money laundering, do they need to authorize specific institutions? Isn't that just another way to monopolize?
Can this framework become a model? I doubt it. There are too many restrictions, and other countries might not buy into it.
You can't even buy coffee with Bitcoin anymore. Why open up this market? It's better to keep it banned.
Moldova, a candidate country for the EU, has officially made a major move—Finance Minister Andrean Gavrilitsa recently announced that a new regulatory framework for crypto assets will be launched in 2026. This is not just talk; it aims to establish legal protections for the entire crypto market in accordance with EU MiCA regulations.
Sound exciting? Hold on, there are quite a few nuances:
**Legal but restricted in use.** Citizens can hold and trade cryptocurrencies with legal protections, but with a major caveat—you cannot use Bitcoin to buy coffee or settle payments with Ethereum. Imagine holding coins that you can't spend—how does that feel?
**Trading profits are taxable.** Holding cryptocurrencies itself is not taxed, but any profits earned must pay a 12% income tax. The government has made it clear: if you play, we get a share. This tax rate is relatively moderate compared to other European countries.
**Anti-money laundering and security controls are essential.** The government is determined to crack down on illegal financing and money laundering. Regulatory authorities will authorize specific institutions to operate, opening up the market while plugging loopholes through regulations.
Why is Moldova so proactive? Simply put, it’s preparing to join the EU. Before integrating into the EU market, it’s building a comprehensive local crypto regulatory system to better meet EU standards and expectations.
**The practical issue now:** Allow trading to generate profits, prohibit using cryptocurrencies as a means of payment, and still impose taxes—does this logic hold? Will this "open yet regulated" model become a template for other countries? Is a 12% tax rate acceptable to you, or do you find it a bit harsh?
Rather than saying it’s a liberalization, it’s more about precise balancing. Moldova chooses to let crypto operate in the sunlight rather than banning it outright or leaving it completely unregulated. This approach might inspire other countries that are still hesitating.