Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The project team's ticker naming really needs to be taken seriously. Green was originally a good target, but it was completely ruined by those messy and chaotic naming strategies—when the name seems to be able to trend to the fourth spot on hot searches, and once the hot search drops, the story is over, and the project disappears without a trace. This logic is indeed quite ironic.
Instead of messing around with these flashy things, it's better to make the name clear so that people scanning the chain can recognize it at a glance. This is actually more beneficial. Projects like Safu and Abebe have the same problem—they are good targets in themselves, but their naming design has been deliberately made ugly. Developers can have such ideas, which is understandable, but if the ticker were more intuitive and standardized, it might be more attractive. Sometimes, simplicity itself is the best marketing.