Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#DeFi协议与应用 Suddenly discovering that UNI burns can actually be arbitraged? 👀 A trader burned 4,000 UNI and ended up making $14,500—what kind of operation is this... It seems to be an opportunity caused by changes in fee structures.
But honestly, this is a bit high for a newbie like me. There’s no visual interface, and I also have to consider gas costs and slippage risks. It feels like I could lose money if I’m not careful. However, this also made me realize that there are many design logics in DeFi that I haven't fully understood yet.
At the same time, I saw that Ondo’s tokenized stock has caused controversy. The front end shows a 0.03% slippage, but the actual on-chain liquidity is only $7,000, and the real slippage could spike up to 45%. 😱 That’s a bit outrageous. It seems like the RWA (Real-World Asset) track looks very cool, but the liquidity definitely needs to be optimized.
Can any experts explain why these arbitrage opportunities exist? Does this mean there’s still a lot of room for adjustment in the parameters of DeFi protocols?