Regarding the choice of project teams, it still comes down to people.

Currently, truly committed and long-term operational project teams in the crypto space are indeed rare. Most projects quickly exploit arbitrage opportunities and then disappear. However, some project teams' actions are worth observing—for example, directing revenue( mainly from taxes and game mechanisms) toward actual ecosystem development.

Taking a certain project as an example, since its launch, it has accumulated a considerable amount of on-chain assets( in the hundreds of BNB range), and the flow of these funds is relatively transparent: primarily used for two purposes—one is token buybacks and liquidity pool deepening, and the other is meme coin burn mechanisms. This model is fundamentally different from projects that simply raise funds.

Token buybacks demonstrate the project's commitment to long-term value, while the burn mechanism directly impacts inflation control. Although this does not guarantee the project's success, it at least shows that the project team is taking actions to fulfill their responsibility to the ecosystem. In markets characterized by information asymmetry, such verifiable on-chain behaviors are often more convincing than promises.