2026-01-16 04:29:59

By extending the timeline and observing $WAL, you will find that this coin's launch rhythm is somewhat restrained—not rushing impulsively with emotions, but gradually lifting the structure as trading volume slowly converges. What does this reveal? Short-term funds are quietly withdrawing, while long-term funds are stepping in. Truly strong coins are never judged by the sharpest gains, but by those who are most reluctant to loosen their holdings.

Many people only focus on the price fluctuations when watching the market, but there is a more critical signal that is often overlooked—retracement efficiency. Observing $WAL's recent performance shows that each retracement is accelerating: the time is getting shorter, and the amplitude is decreasing. What does this mean? It indicates that the selling pressure from previous rounds has been almost fully digested, leaving mostly those chips that are dead set against selling. Once the sellers gradually exit, the price trend will no longer be influenced by short-term emotions.

WAL1,13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaMaskVictim

· 11h ago

Honestly, I haven't paid much attention to the retracement efficiency from this perspective before. Looking at WAL this time, it’s indeed a bit of a dead end… short-term fluctuations are small, and it really feels like they’re filtering out chips. Short-term traders are being cut one after another, and the iron will of those who stay behind won’t be broken unless they clear the market. Let’s see if it can truly shake off emotional influence later. WAL this time definitely has a sense of weight, not that illusion of rapid rise and fall… signs of long-term funds stepping in are quite obvious, but we still need to watch out for a sudden big drop. The idea of pushing the structure upward sounds comfortable, but I’m just worried it’s all just pie in the sky… only when the day comes that it’s not driven by emotions will it count. Is shrinking trading volume actually a good sign? It feels a bit counterintuitive, I need to see if there are other pitfalls…

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 12h ago

Looking at WAL's recent moves, it’s definitely a bit deliberate... Short-term funds have withdrawn, long-term funds are stepping in, and the rhythm is quite steady. The detail of retracement efficiency is spot on; every dip accelerates, indicating that the chips are truly consolidating. Hey, isn’t this just the main force quietly doing their thing? But to be fair, how much should the trading volume converge before it’s considered complete? We still need to keep watching. Gradually building the structure, waiting for long-term funds to fully take over... this rhythm is much more stable than those coins with rapid gains. The chips that are unwilling to sell at all show that confidence is still there. It feels like this kind of strategy is what a truly strong coin should look like.

View OriginalReply0

HashBandit

· 01-16 04:59

ngl the volume compression thing checks out... been watching these patterns since my gpu mining days and it's always the same story. long money vs short money, dead simple. back when i was still mining ether before the merge killed my whole rig setup, you could spot these exact structures forming on chain. anyway $WAL's looking solid on that metric, no cap.

Reply0

BearHugger

· 01-16 04:52

Those who hold onto their chips tightly are the real winners, I buy into this logic. WAL's recent momentum is indeed interesting; the faster the pullback, the more it indicates that the bears are running out of ammunition.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 01-16 04:50

This guy's analysis is pretty insightful. I hadn't really thought about the retracement efficiency from this perspective. Compared to those who are always shouting about the increase, your method of analyzing chips is much more reliable. I just don't know if we can really hold out this time; as retail investors, we still have to rely on luck.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-4745f9ce