The critical point has already appeared in 2026: privacy is no longer just an additional label for projects, but a fundamental requirement that institutional finance truly cannot do without.



Just look at the changes over the past two years. BlackRock's BUIDL asset scale has surpassed 10 billion, the EU's MiCA is beginning to be fully implemented, and global regulators are unifying their slogan of "auditability without disclosure"—this is not a coincidence, but a market vote with real money.

Some projects are only now starting to layout the privacy track, but certain Layer1s have been all-in six years ago. Once the EVM mainnet is activated, developers writing privacy DeFi will be as smooth as writing ordinary contracts. Even better, solutions like Hedger feature a dual characteristic of "privacy toggle + audit backdoor" built into transactions—truly achieving both fish and bear's paw.

What does this really mean?

Fund managers' holdings will no longer be exposed on-chain, family offices will have genuine privacy protection for wealth transfer, and cross-border payment institutions can pass FATF reviews without exposing customer identities. These seemingly specific application scenarios all point in the same direction—privacy is evolving from a cool technical feature into the most fundamental operational logic in the financial world.

From another perspective, whoever masters compliant privacy in the next decade will essentially hold the key to the door of institutional funds.

What do you think? After 2026, will privacy become a standard entry threshold for blockchain projects?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 17h ago
It seems logically consistent, but I have to say—an "audit backdoor" sounds like a re-entrancy attack point. Who dares to bet that regulators won't peek secretly?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7vip
· 01-16 04:58
In plain terms, projects that are still hesitating now will be left out in the cold by 2026.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTaxvip
· 01-16 04:56
It should have been like this a long time ago. Projects that rely on transparency to survive are starting to panic.
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickstervip
· 01-16 04:56
Haha, I've had my eye on this for a long time. The group that went all-in on privacy six years ago is now the happiest.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 01-16 04:45
The all-in project from six years ago should be taking off now, really looking forward to it.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctorvip
· 01-16 04:45
The consultation records show that this wave of privacy demands has indeed shifted from being a "bonus" to a "lifesaving medicine." But the problem is—how many projects currently promoting privacy have truly solved the clinical challenge of balancing auditability and privacy? Most are still just theoretical discussions.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)