The discussions about BTC and ETH in the past two years have become increasingly interesting. It’s no longer just a simple technical comparison, but a deep interpretation of asset attributes.



First, let's talk about BTC. Comparing it to gold has become a consensus for many, and the logic behind this is quite solid. The value of gold comes from mining costs and scarcity, while BTC’s value derives from its mathematical code and supply cap. In the upcoming cycle where inflationary pressures may rise, BTC’s role as a "hard currency" becomes especially critical—it has become the true outlet for risk-averse capital.

From a data perspective, the global gold market cap is about $14 trillion, while BTC hovers around $1.8 trillion. What does this gap mean? If BTC truly meets the demand for digital asset allocation by global central banks, the price potential is enormous. Following the logic of market cap parity, a single BTC could directly reach $700,000. This is not a pipe dream but a natural result of the digital migration of global assets.

The story of ETH is somewhat different. If BTC is used for "storing" value, ETH is used for "using" value, corresponding to the industrial attributes of silver. Silver is a necessity in photovoltaics and electronics manufacturing, and ETH is a "fuel" in DeFi, smart contracts, and L2 scaling. As long as the Web3 world continues to operate, the burning demand for ETH will persist.

From a valuation perspective, silver’s market cap is far below gold’s, but its volatility is greater and its explosive potential is stronger. ETH follows this logic as well—it’s not here to compete with BTC over who is more "gold-like," but it is the lifeblood of the digital industry. In the later stages of a bull market, ETH’s elasticity often surpasses BTC’s.

To summarize: BTC is responsible for stable wealth defense, while ETH is responsible for wealth growth. The investment approach for 2026 should be just that—using BTC to safeguard your asset floor, and ETH to push your asset ceiling higher. This is not a binary choice but a complete digital asset allocation system.
BTC-0,39%
ETH0,5%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 01-16 06:51
Is it really 700,000 USD each? Haha, but it kind of makes sense... The gap in gold market value is indeed outrageous. --- BTC piggy bank, ETH milk machine, that analogy is perfect. --- Wait, is he serious about digital migration, or is he just hyping again? --- I agree with the fuel theory for ETH, but can the demand for burning really last until 2026? --- It seems the configuration system is fine, but it all depends on how much further the RMB can fall... --- 2026, haha. I'll just prepare for a margin call explosion this year first. --- "A complete digital asset allocation system," sounds like buying into two reasons for a dip at the same time. --- The silver analogy hit me, but ETH's elasticity surpassing BTC... the end of the bull market is real. --- Sounds nice, but it's basically betting that the central bank will have to loosen monetary policy.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShruggedvip
· 01-16 04:55
700,000? Haha, sounds pretty tempting, but that logic is a bit too idealistic. Will the central bank really allocate BTC? --- I agree with the idea that ETH is just fuel, but can the demand for burning really sustain the price... --- Damn, this configuration approach makes me want to go all in. Protect the lower limit, then suddenly hit the upper limit—sounds awesome. --- BTC as a hard currency is fine, but comparing it with central bank allocations is a bit too optimistic. --- Will ETH surpass BTC in the mid to late stages? Let's see when the bull market arrives; I'm still dreaming now. --- Choosing one or the other? Bro, I can't even hold one steadily, let alone talk about a configuration system. --- The gold and silver analogy isn't bad, but it feels like every time it's just the same comparison, not much new.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKeyvip
· 01-16 04:48
700,000 for one BTC? That's hilarious. If that's the case, what about ADA? Should it also take off?
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happenvip
· 01-16 04:35
700,000 per coin? Sounds crazy but also seems plausible. We'll see when the central banks actually start allocating.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)