2026-01-16 04:28:34

The market has been operating based on "gut feeling," resulting in a collapse of trust. Many projects make promises everywhere but lack actual constraints—no specific service standards(SLAs), no written delivery commitments, no clear receipt tracking, and no remedial mechanisms after failure.

It seems there is a new approach to change this situation: by introducing verifiable delivery standards, signing contracts, establishing transferable reputation profiles, and providing refund guarantees when goals are not met. This mechanism turns the intangible "feeling" into concrete constraints.

This morning at GMT+7, I tried a small project where Party A directly confirmed the scope of requirements, and I went to execute. Whether this clear process can truly improve the current delivery situation in Web3 will soon be answered.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MercilessHalal

· 01-19 00:35

Haha, this is exactly what Web3 is missing. Black and white words can really save lives.

View OriginalReply0

StakeWhisperer

· 01-18 23:07

To be honest, I'm tired of this way of talking. Every time it's "introducing mechanisms" and "hard constraints," but what happens? People still sneak away, and contracts are just like worthless paper. The problem isn't with the tools; it's with human nature.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressHunter

· 01-17 13:24

Haha, finally someone is talking about this. These Web3 folks only know how to boast, they don't even have contracts yet they come to raise funds, truly incredible. Get it online quickly, I believe this approach might be able to redeem this market. Honestly, operating based on intuition has long been a dead end; this time, we really need to rely on written agreements. Let's see if we can really put a stop to this crooked trend, or else it'll just be a field of leeks. In my opinion, SLA systems should have been implemented long ago to save us from being cut every day. But on the other hand, who will supervise these "hard constraints"? Is it just empty talk? I'd like to see how it performs in practice—whether it can reduce incidents like rug pulls. Is it true? I only believe in a compensation mechanism; otherwise, it's just pie in the sky. This idea is good, but I'm just worried it might get distorted during execution.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterKing

· 01-16 04:58

Relying on intuition? That's just gambling, I'm tired of it. A written and signed contract is the real deal, otherwise, what's the difference from an air coin.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSeller

· 01-16 04:54

Bro, I like this gameplay. Finally, someone has come up with something real. If SLA can really be implemented, those project teams that keep just talking big will be trembling.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 01-16 04:51

The contract + refund mechanism sounds right, but can Web3 people really implement it? I have my doubts. --- With verifiable standards and reputation profiles, it feels like traditional law is just being moved onto the blockchain. Will it be effective? --- Try this micro-project, will Party A really follow the scope of requirements? I bet five dollars that the requirements will change later. --- Service standards, delivery commitments, remedial mechanisms... Basically, Web3 is finally learning how to do business. --- SLA-like things should have existed long ago; it's a bit upsetting that it's only being done now. --- It's still a GMT+7 trial project; I've already given up here, waiting for someone to standardize the process before proceeding. --- The key is, who will arbitrate? No matter how clear the contract is, what's the use if no one enforces it? --- If this mechanism can really be implemented, Web3 might truly transform from a "scam paradise" to a "serious industry." --- Refund guarantees sound good, but only if the project team is still alive.

View OriginalReply0

PumpDoctrine

· 01-16 04:50

Now, Web3 is like this. There are too many projects that talk big but deliver little... This SLA mechanism sounds reliable, but only truly being implemented counts.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiChef

· 01-16 04:38

Haha, finally someone is talking about this. Before, it was just a bunch of empty promises, and once the money went in, there was no more news. This SLA+refund approach is definitely worth trying; otherwise, Web3 will always be a trust black hole.

View OriginalReply0