The "nobles" of decentralized storage are truly expensive—Filecoin's pricing is constantly changing, and Arweave's fees are so high that many small and medium projects are discouraged. But recently, in the Sui ecosystem, a new player called Walrus Protocol has broken this cycle with a set of RedStuff erasure coding technology.



The most direct comparison: storing the same data, Walrus's redundancy cost is only one five-hundredth of Arweave's. To understand this in practical terms—if you upload a 1GB NFT resource pack, it might cost dozens of dollars on Arweave, but only a few cents on Walrus. This is not just cheaper; the key is that data security is actually higher. Even if two-thirds of the nodes go offline simultaneously, the files can still be recovered, thanks to its special redundancy design.

What's more interesting is that Walrus breaks the traditional "storage is cold storage" mindset. It allows data to be called and programmed directly through Sui's smart contracts. What does this mean? If you upload a set of AI training data, it can be automatically licensed and paid for via smart contracts, or the NFT metadata can be updated in real-time based on on-chain conditions—creating a complete closed loop from storage to application without intermediaries.

From an application perspective, Walrus has already partnered with multiple projects in game asset storage and AI model repositories. As the Sui ecosystem expands, the demand for such underlying storage solutions will only grow stronger. For projects that need to control costs, ensure high availability, and seamlessly integrate with on-chain applications, Walrus is definitely worth a deep dive.
FIL-9,28%
AR1,43%
SUI-2,03%
WAL-1,79%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 01-19 01:49
Really, one in five hundred? That number seems a bit exaggerated, or am I understanding Arweave too superficially?
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugeevip
· 01-18 06:57
One in five hundred? That number is exaggerated, is it real? Wait, can Walrus really store 1GB for just a few cents? Why do I find it hard to believe? Arweave's situation is a bit uncertain...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMomvip
· 01-16 04:50
Wait, one in five hundred? This number isn't fooling me, right? Feels like it's just another Sui marketing tactic.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCriticvip
· 01-16 04:41
Mr. Land is right; Walrus has indeed implemented the cost leverage. But I am more concerned about—how does this RedStuff erasure code perform in extreme scenarios? Are there any actual benchmark results? Relying solely on theoretical one in five hundred still feels too abstract.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBotvip
· 01-16 04:40
Wait, one five-hundredth of the cost of Arweave? That number is way too outrageous, feels a bit exaggerated. Now small and medium projects can finally breathe a sigh of relief, after being exploited by Arweave quite badly before. The key is that it can directly connect with on-chain applications, without having to fuss between storage and application layers, which is indeed awesome.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin