2026-01-16 04:00:26

#美国就业数据不及预期 Real money in action

The US spot Ethereum ETF saw a net inflow of $164 million yesterday.

It may seem like market sentiment fluctuation, but behind it are institutional-level allocation moves. When large sums of money appear, they usually have one characteristic — they don’t come to chase the high. Simply put, institutional money isn’t used to buy the top.

What’s more worth paying attention to is how things will unfold in the next few days. The capital flow of spot ETFs often reflects deeper market expectations, especially around key economic indicators like non-farm payroll data in the US.

Currently, the allocation demand for leading cryptocurrencies like $BTC, $ETH, and $SOL is indeed increasing. The movement of funds always leads market sentiment, and this has been validated in every cycle.

The next focus will be on trading volume and changes in holdings.

ETH-8,42%

BTC-4,64%

SOL-7,05%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

blockBoy

· 01-19 03:39

Institutions are quietly accumulating, while retail investors are still hesitating. The gap is real. --- 1.64 billion in inflows is nothing much; the key is whether they can stay steady afterward. --- Wait, if everyone is acting this way before the non-farm payrolls, does that mean another wave is coming? --- Funds don't lie; they are much more reliable than emotions. --- Increasing the allocation to SOL this time was quite unexpected; I didn't have such a strong outlook before. --- Those who understand know—institutional buying and retail investors' actions are not the same thing. --- Let's look at the trading volume; that's the real test. --- Here we go again. Every time, they say funds lead emotions, but in the end, it's still follow-the-trend buying. --- Should I buy now? Or wait until after the non-farm payrolls? I'm a bit hesitant. --- The inflow levels of BTC and ETH do feel a bit different this time.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-18 12:55

Institutions are quietly accumulating, while we retail investors are still debating the rise and fall. What a gap.

View OriginalReply0

faded_wojak.eth

· 01-17 19:19

Institutions are really quietly accumulating chips, this wave is different... Looking at the holdings data is much more reliable than looking at the sentiment.

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon

· 01-16 04:24

Institutions are quietly accumulating positions, while retail investors are still debating the rise and fall. The gap is significant.

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 01-16 04:21

The feeling of institutions bottoming out has arrived; this wave is different.

View OriginalReply0

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 01-16 04:17

Institutions are really quietly accumulating, and this influx data is a bit different 1.64 billion is not too much or too little, but the key is this timing... On the eve of non-farm payrolls, institutions are actually increasing their positions. Have they sensed something? Position data is the true reflection; trading volume can't be fooled It's not about chasing highs to enter, indicating that bottom signals are indeed flashing Waiting to see the trend in the next few days, this window period is very critical Funds always move faster than emotions, and this time it will be verified again The ETH inflow is indeed a bit interesting, have institutions' tastes changed? I bet the trading volume will increase; otherwise, this round of entry would be too casual

View OriginalReply0

ChainWanderingPoet

· 01-16 04:11

Institutions are not fools. When they start pouring real money in, it's time to wake up. --- 1.64 billion invested, this is not retail investor behavior. Looking forward to the next wave. --- The theory that capital leads sentiment is often validated most fiercely. --- Entering before non-farm payrolls—this timing is interesting. --- Changes in holdings are the real indicator; don't just look at sentiment. --- Top-tier coins being locked in by institutions—what does that mean... --- This wave is different. It's not about hot-blooded bottom-fishing; it's about calm allocation. --- Whether the trading volume breaks this price level will reveal the truth. --- Institutional inflows are often less obvious on the surface; the real show is yet to come.

View OriginalReply0

degenwhisperer

· 01-16 04:10

Institutions are really quietly accumulating, this move might have a chance

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 01-16 04:06

Institutions are really quietly getting on board, this wave is different Wait, is the poor non-farm payroll data really good news? I'm a bit confused 1.64 billion entered the market, they just throw money in without saying a word, I've seen this trick too many times We need to keep an eye on the trading volume, or it's easy to get caught When will it be our retail investors' turn to enjoy a moment of happiness Capital leading sentiment, this statement is always correct, but when it comes to critical moments, luck still plays a role

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 01-16 04:03

Institutions are really quietly positioning themselves; 164 million is not a small amount, and this wave feels different. --- The data on spot ETFs is getting stronger and stronger; big players won't chase blindly. This is a signal. --- Let's see how the trading volume moves in the next few days; holdings don't lie. --- Capital leads sentiment, and this pattern has been reliable every time. Institutions entering now are definitely prepared. --- Before and after non-farm payrolls, the market is indeed sensitive, but the influx of ETH is so strong that it's quite interesting. --- The demand for top-tier coins is rising, indicating that big players are also placing bets. This logic makes sense. --- Pure inflow of 164 million; don't underestimate this amount. The actions of institutions are often more honest than words. --- The key still depends on changes in holdings; looking at inflow alone isn't enough. We need to see if they can hold on.

View OriginalReply0