2026-01-16 03:40:32

#数字资产市场动态 Looking back on the development path of this project, it’s truly a bit of a sigh. At the end of 2021, they invested $1 billion to enter the ZK track, but what happened? In just a few years, they changed their approach. Later, they shifted to Agglayer, hoping for a turnaround, but unfortunately, the market didn’t give them a chance. Now they’ve adjusted to the payments track, yet the token price has already spoken for everything — dropping from $2.98 to $0.098, a nearly 97% decline. The performance of $ETH during the same period is simply worlds apart. Rather than calling it a strategic adjustment, it’s more like constantly testing the limitations of certain ideas. Friends holding tokens, you might need to seriously consider your next move.

ETH0,59%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTArtisanHQ

· 01-19 00:12

ngl this reads like watching a creator pivot their entire artistic vision every season... except the canvas keeps shrinking and the market's already left the gallery. from zk to agglayer to payments—it's giving "throwing everything at the wall" energy, except nothing's sticking. 97% drawdown is honestly a meta-narrative about failed tokenomics and misaligned incentives if i've ever seen one

Reply0

CrossChainMessenger

· 01-16 17:51

Spending a hundred million and changing strategies three times, how unpredictable is that... It's still more reliable to buy ETH.

View OriginalReply0

GovernancePretender

· 01-16 15:51

这项目真的是把我整无语了，十亿砸进去就跟打水漂似的，三心二意改来改去还是死路一条

Reply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 01-16 08:59

Spending a hundred million to change your approach is truly outrageous. It's actually more straightforward to go all in on ETH.

View OriginalReply0

rugged_again

· 01-16 03:55

Spending a hundred million and not making a splash at all, this move is truly brilliant. Changing your approach is like switching spatulas when stir-frying; the problem isn't the tool, buddy.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinGuardian

· 01-16 03:53

Billion-dollar investments, and after a few years, they admit defeat, still having to tinker with three or four tracks... Isn't this a typical case of "trial and error costs paid by retail investors"? This isn't a strategic adjustment; it's just not thinking it through, friends. Falling from $3 to $0.1, that's really brutal.

View OriginalReply0

ForeverBuyingDips

· 01-16 03:49

Oh my god, is this the legendary "all in IQ tax"? A 97% drop directly makes it a legend.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-16 03:48

Spending a billion dollars and repeatedly switching tracks—this is just helping us verify what "strategic misstep" really means.

View OriginalReply0

PseudoIntellectual

· 01-16 03:47

Damn, this is a typical case of changing tracks frequently to die. One moment ZK, the next payments, and the 97% drop says it all.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 01-16 03:44

Oh my god, this is what I mean by "swaying from side to side," from ZK to Agglayer to payments, it feels like there's no direction... I don't dare sleep holding my coins.

View OriginalReply0