Many people in the market see Xeet and instinctively think it's just another Points mining project. But if you only understand it this way, it's too superficial.
The cleverness of this project lies in—it's turned the concept of "influence" into a structured economic design. Instead of everyone posting under the same rules to earn points.
What does this mean? It means that different types of creators and various content production styles will generate completely different economic incentives within the system. Some rely on quantity, some on quality, and others on social network effects—each approach can find its own monetization logic.
This is the depth that Web3 innovative projects should explore. It's not just about simple token distribution mechanisms, but about redesigning the underlying logic of social economy.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
notSatoshi1971
· 01-18 18:20
Solved it. Isn't this just turning influence into a product? Much smarter than those one-size-fits-all mining projects.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 01-16 04:00
Another mining project? Wake up, they're working on economic system design.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 01-16 03:55
Another mining project? Wake up, this time it's really different.
If the differentiated incentive system can truly be implemented, that would be awesome, but can it avoid ending in failure again?
Alright, I believe you have some ideas this time.
Xeet's gameplay sounds like a reimagining of X's economic system, which is interesting.
Re-designing the rules again? The previous projects said the same, and in the end?
Not everyone will be able to catch this wave of benefits, it still depends on who can run faster.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 01-16 03:46
Wait, I need to take a close look at the fund flow of this incentive model... On the surface, it's called "differentiated design," but on-chain data shows that this multi-level scoring system often hides complex fund relationships. Different profit logic sounds appealing, but in reality, it creates arbitrage opportunities. Interesting.
Many people in the market see Xeet and instinctively think it's just another Points mining project. But if you only understand it this way, it's too superficial.
The cleverness of this project lies in—it's turned the concept of "influence" into a structured economic design. Instead of everyone posting under the same rules to earn points.
What does this mean? It means that different types of creators and various content production styles will generate completely different economic incentives within the system. Some rely on quantity, some on quality, and others on social network effects—each approach can find its own monetization logic.
This is the depth that Web3 innovative projects should explore. It's not just about simple token distribution mechanisms, but about redesigning the underlying logic of social economy.