We're taking the open source route with our Solana robotics development kit! The plan is to build out a thriving community first, then open up participation for token holders who want to contribute on GitHub. This whole thing is really about empowering the community—making it a genuine collaborative effort rather than just a top-down project. Your support has been incredible, and we're excited to see where this goes together.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Anon4461vip
· 01-18 15:48
The open-source approach is good, but the real key is whether the community can come alive.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_brokevip
· 01-18 13:10
Open-source approach is powerful, but can the community really support it?
View OriginalReply0
MrDecodervip
· 01-16 03:59
Open-source approach is good, but it depends on how much token holders can actually participate...
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtistvip
· 01-16 03:44
Open-source approach is good, but I'm worried it might turn into another scheme to harvest retail investors later on.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObservervip
· 01-16 03:41
Open-source ideas are good, but how many communities can truly become active?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesisvip
· 01-16 03:38
From a code perspective, open sourcing this move is interesting... but it’s worth noting that the sequence of building the community first and then releasing token participation rights requires monitoring the timeline of subsequent contract deployments to assess sincerity.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin