Dusk has recently attracted attention, with the price oscillating around 0.062. It seems to have fallen to a relatively bottom area. From a technical perspective, this chain is specifically designed for regulated financial institutions, cleverly balancing commercial privacy and regulatory audits using zero-knowledge proof technology — a scarce solution in Web3.



What’s more interesting is its commercial progress. The team plans to bring over 300 million euros of real securities assets on-chain through a partnership with NPEX. The landing of the mainnet EVM in January will be a significant milestone, and by then, this chain could become the most direct connection channel between traditional finance and Web3.

From a track perspective, RWA (Real World Asset on-chain) is a long-term growth point, and Dusk’s infrastructure position in this field has not yet been fully recognized by the market. In the short term, consider entering in batches around 0.062, with a stop-loss set at 0.058. The long-term logic is sound, and reaching 0.1 is not an unreasonable target.
DUSK3,97%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
rugpull_survivorvip
· 01-18 20:49
0.062 is indeed a bit attractive, but I still need to wait and see how the EVM performance in January turns out. Linking the 300 million euro assets of NPEX... sounds very appealing, but real implementation is the key. I am optimistic about the RWA track, just not sure if Dusk can break through the encirclement. Setting the stop-loss at 0.058 is very safe; I agree with this logic. Zero-knowledge proofs balance privacy and auditability; I haven't seen many projects truly achieve this setting. It mainly depends on the team's execution capability; having a good story alone isn't enough. Long-term 0.1... if that NPEX deal really goes through, I might be underestimating it. --- Honestly, I still feel a bit hesitant, after all, the financial chain track is new and complex. Friendly regulation sounds good, but could it backfire and cause restrictions? That's what I want to know. Forget it, I'll just buy in batches; anyway, at low levels, it's just a gamble. --- A bit confused, why are so many RWA projects clustering together, and how can Dusk break through? The EVM mainnet launches in January; let's see if there are any black swans then. --- Hmm... this game is quite big, but I'm more concerned about whether big players are already lurking at the bottom.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollectorvip
· 01-16 23:29
The set of zero-knowledge proofs is indeed impressive, but can it really reassure traditional finance folks to go on-chain? Still a big question mark. Let's wait until January when EVM is implemented; jumping in now might be a bit early. 300 million euros sounds impressive, but the real indicator is when the funds actually arrive. RWA is the right trend, Dusk has a good position, but I'm worried that hype might outweigh the fundamentals. People who bought the bottom say it's the bottom, but I'm still on the sidelines. Setting a stop-loss at 0.058 is okay, but I'm not sure if it can hold. The team seems reliable, but market awareness is indeed poor.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 01-16 03:51
wait, 300M euros in real securities actually getting onboarded? or is this just another "coming soon" narrative we've seen a thousand times... need to trace those NPEX wallet movements first before i believe the hype ngl
Reply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 01-16 03:48
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed advanced, but honestly, it's just about walking the tightrope between compliance and privacy. Whether it can stay stable depends on how reliable NPEX is. Wait, 300 million euros on the chain? That number sounds a bit exaggerated, feels like the usual old trick. I didn't follow the 0.062, but I always feel something's off. With such a big RWA trend, why is Dusk's popularity so low? If the EVM goes live in January, it can become a connection channel? That's a bit optimistic. Traditional finance isn't that easy to enter. Honestly, I’d rather wait until it drops to 0.05 before considering. This recent rebound feels fake. 0.1? I can't figure out the logic behind this valuation. Can someone help me sort it out?
View OriginalReply0
StillBuyingTheDipvip
· 01-16 03:47
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed impressive, but can they really get traditional finance on board? It still depends on whether the mainnet can truly launch in January. RWA hitting 300 million euros on-chain sounds impressive, but Dusk isn't the only player in this space, and competition will be fierce. 0.062 is quite interesting; I’m allocating a small position to test the waters, and I’ve already set my stop-loss. This compliance chain's long-term logic is solid; the question is how long the short-term hype can last. Bottom-fishing requires patience; don’t rush to get in, as it might still fall further. Honestly, the RWA track is really underestimated, and Dusk’s positioning is quite unique. Let’s wait and see how January performs. If the mainnet really runs stably, then I’ll consider increasing my position. Is this another overlooked good project by the market, or just another wave of retail investors getting caught? It’s hard to tell.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrincevip
· 01-16 03:33
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed quite interesting, but how far a regulation-friendly chain can go is still a question mark. Wait, 300 million euros on the chain? If that really materializes, it will be truly different. Batch entry at 0.062 has sparked some interest, but I'm worried about the reliability of NPEX... RWA (Real-World Asset) track is hot, but it's still early to say if Dusk can become a leader; we're watching and waiting. The price has been fluctuating for so long, and there's a consensus on the bottom, but breaking below it wouldn't be surprising. Mainnet EVM launching in a month? The market is waiting for this opportunity; it depends on actual performance. I've heard quite a few about compliant chains, but few can really be used in practice. Why should Dusk be different? 0.1 is fine, but the key is whether genuine funds will come in later.
View OriginalReply0
Gm_Gn_Merchantvip
· 01-16 03:29
Zero-knowledge proofs balance privacy and regulation? Sounds good, but afraid it's just talk 300 million euros on the chain sounds impressive, but the real implementation is another matter RWA is indeed a hot track, but whether Dusk can hold up remains to be seen Be cautious with the 0.062 bottom-fishing, too many people are trapped Mainnet EVM really coming is the only thing that counts, don’t miss another deadline The biggest risk for projects like this is policy changes; regulatory risks must also be guarded against The 0.1 target is a bit optimistic, maybe try testing the waters at 0.08? Is the team reliable? That’s the key.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin