2026-01-16 03:00:32

Thursday Trading Review:

$BTC rebound short-selling strategy was executed precisely throughout the day, accumulating a total of 4979 points in space, with a profit of 35826u.

The core of the strategy revolves around shorting at the rebound high point, and every direction given in advance has been perfectly validated. Currently, I have achieved 10 consecutive wins. I never pursue high-frequency trading to stack win rates; those who follow me know that the principle of each operation is first and foremost stability. Combining technical analysis with market rhythm, I strictly control risk exposure—this is my trading philosophy.

The live trading records are as follows:

First trade: #美国核心物价涨幅不及市场预估 96673 entry, 95609 exit, profit of 1064 points, earning 8507u

Second trade: $BTC 96801 entry, 95934 exit, profit of 867 points, earning 5204u

Third trade: $BTC 97112 entry, 95688 exit, profit of 1424 points, earning 9121u

Fourth trade: $BTC 97629 entry, 96005 exit, profit of 1624 points, earning 12994u

I don’t rely on theories; I let strategy implementation and profits speak. As the year-end approaches, in this final wave of the market, I want to help everyone seize opportunities and steadily pocket profits. If the market is still stuck, it’s better to follow this rhythm—use strength to fulfill promises, turn the tide, and one month is enough.

$BTC $ETH

BTC0,71%

ETH1,47%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVictim

· 01-18 18:59

A 10-game winning streak, it always feels like one more win would turn it around haha

View OriginalReply0

BrokenDAO

· 01-18 14:22

10 consecutive wins, huh? Listen to this phrase—has the game equilibrium been broken? I'm just curious, behind this perfect validation, how is the incentive mechanism twisted... human weaknesses, there must be some kind of justification to package it as a "robust strategy," right? Mechanism flaws have always been like this; the more confident you are in a statement, the more hidden the risks become.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretDiary

· 01-17 04:44

10 consecutive wins sound pretty easy, but after the core inflation data is released, can it still stay so steady... Anyway, I don't have the guts for that.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlarm

· 01-16 03:30

The numbers don't add up again. Four transactions total 3979 points, so how did it become 4979... Have you checked this account address on the chain?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedNotStirred

· 01-16 03:20

A 10-game winning streak sounds good, but people who constantly emphasize stability often get wiped out on the very next trade. Is this a curse? Haha

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerForever

· 01-16 03:14

Here we go again, a 10-game winning streak? How come these numbers are getting more and more outrageous...

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor

· 01-16 03:13

A 10-game winning streak is a bit intense, but this wave of market movement indeed has a lot of room. Just follow the rhythm and you'll be fine.

View OriginalReply0

SeasonedInvestor

· 01-16 03:08

Another 10 consecutive wins, I find this rhythm very comfortable to watch. Rebound to a high point to set up short positions, it seems you have a solid grasp of this wave of market行情.

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 01-16 03:05

The data is here; a 10-game winning streak isn't just talk. However, whether to set up short positions at the rebound high depends on whether the nodes are stable. Can the risk exposure really be handled?

View OriginalReply0

BearEatsAll

· 01-16 03:01

10 consecutive wins are indeed outrageous, but this wave of market movement is really a bit strange... Rebound and then cut short positions, the rhythm is well-controlled, but I'm just worried that a wave of pullback might directly hit the limit down?

View OriginalReply0