2026-01-16 02:44:03

There is quite a bit of news today.

The biggest development is that social media platform X announced adjustments to its developer API rules, mainly banning applications that rely primarily on reward-based posting mechanisms. The initial reaction from everyone was—this could spell the end for meme-like projects. But upon further reflection, it might not be that dire. Policy tightening is often a prelude to a formal upgrade, and the key depends on whether project teams are willing to adapt. Essentially, it's a cost-benefit issue—whether it's worth investing in new solutions to circumvent restrictions. Often, when a directive is issued from above, a variety of workaround strategies emerge below, and this sector may be no exception.

Another piece of news is that a well-known project has opened subscriptions for its NFT minting. The entry threshold is set at 200 USD for 40,000 quotas, which is still attractive compared to other popular projects. Those interested should act quickly, as opportunities like this usually don't last long.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlOrRegret

· 01-18 21:41

Haha, it's time to start dissecting rule loopholes again. The project teams are definitely brainstorming new tricks this time. The 200U threshold is okay, but it's uncertain whether this round will be profitable or result in losses. This restriction from X is, to put it bluntly, the start of a leek-cutting sequence. Let's see who can survive this round of screening. Still the same saying: policy tightening = opportunity arises. It all depends on who reacts quickly. Once again, this kind of time-sensitive tactic is a classic FOMO generator. Initial coin offerings are always a game of fast fish eating slow fish.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandsCriminal

· 01-18 15:59

The mouth-lickers are looking for new ways to make a living again. This wave of API bans is probably just a rinse and wash routine.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 01-17 09:17

Hash rate profit ratio remains the same; the real opportunity lies in the ROI cycle, not policy trends. This wave of bans, frankly, is just cost screening. The projects that survive are actually high-quality targets. An entry cost of 200U with a quota of 40,000, this unit price is indeed worth paying attention to, but the return cycle needs to be considered. Policy tightening = market reshuffling. Those with cash on hand should now plan and position themselves.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-16 03:14

Uh, this wave from X is really insane, the mouth-pullers need to think of new ways, but honestly the stricter the ban, the more people find workarounds, it just comes down to who reacts faster.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-16 03:14

With this cut of X, mouth-labor types are indeed a bit panicked, but you're right, alternative tactics have long been in the works, it all depends on who reacts faster. 200U to leverage 40,000 quota? The mint price is okay, much more conscientious than that broken project last week, but it still depends on secondary market performance, don't get cut off.

View OriginalReply0

MevSandwich

· 01-16 03:12

Are the mouth-lashing types going to be over? Wake up, there are so many alternative tricks, but the key still depends on who can run faster.

View OriginalReply0

NftMetaversePainter

· 01-16 02:49

honestly x cracking down on reward-posting apps is just window dressing... the real game is whether devs bother to rework their stack, ngl

Reply0