Zama recently launched a Koi variant voting event, which greatly increased community engagement. To be honest, I have always admired their approach—combining advanced FHE fully homomorphic encryption technology with creative community interaction. This balance is not something every project can achieve. This vote may seem like just selecting the most beautiful design, but the underlying logic is deeper: by involving users in design decisions, it not only enhances community identity but also represents an innovative attempt at Zama's ecosystem governance. This model of joint creation between technical teams and the community is exactly the direction Web3 projects should take.

ZAMA6,56%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
MEV_Whisperervip
· 01-19 02:31
Haha, Zama's move is truly brilliant, the community has really been mobilized.

---

Just by voting on a design, governance can be so in-depth, there's definitely some substance there.

---

Honestly, this is the right way to open up, not that fake democracy.

---

The combination of FHE+community operation is starting to feel a bit authentic.

---

Here comes another "community-driven" story, half real and half fake.

---

This time, Zama really gave the community a voice, unlike some projects that just ride the hype.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 01-18 23:47
Wow, I finally understand this voting. It's not just voting for the sake of voting; those who get it, get it.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBrovip
· 01-16 03:03
Honestly, Zama's recent moves are quite impressive. But on the other hand, is the voting design well-crafted, and can the community truly participate in governance?
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClickvip
· 01-16 03:03
Voting is actually just a gimmick; the real power still isn't in the hands of the team.

---

Zama really knows how to play the game this time, understanding how to appease the community.

---

It's called co-creation in nice words, but frankly, it's just a marketing tactic.

---

I just want to know if the final voting results will actually be adopted...

---

Well, at least it's better than projects that don't care about the community at all.

---

I don't quite understand FHE technology, but this kind of participation definitely gets people excited.

---

Another project relying on voting to generate buzz—let's see how long they can keep it up.

---

Gotta say, Zama's operational approach is pretty on point; this definitely makes the community more sticky.

---

Curiosity is kicking in—what exactly does the Koi design look like?

---

Instead of just voting, focusing on doing the technology well is the right way.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorervip
· 01-16 02:59
Ah, this voting activity does have some substance, but it's a bit too idealistic. In the end, it's still the players who vote the most who win.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessApevip
· 01-16 02:56
Wow, Zama's move this time is really impressive.

Voting is just a cover; the core is to truly involve the community.

It's rare to see such a strong technology like FHE being used to foster a sense of community.

Web3 should be like this—no more fake stuff.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 01-16 02:50
Voting sounds good, but can Zama really listen to the community's opinions? Or is it just a gimmick again?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin