There is no shortage of complaints about KYC in Web3, with many saying it goes against the spirit of decentralization. But recently, I saw a project experimenting with Self-Sovereign Identity, which is quite an interesting idea—completely separating verification from data.



Speaking of on-chain interactions, what’s the most annoying moment? Worse than a surge in Gas fees is when an obscure DeFi protocol suddenly pops up asking you to upload your passport and take a selfie holding your ID. That moment of fear is hard to describe—handing over your personal information to an unknown project, what if hackers steal the data?

The brilliance of this Self-Sovereign Identity scheme lies here. It doesn’t require you to store copies of your ID on their servers waiting to be leaked. Instead, it generates zero-knowledge proofs locally or through authorized third parties. Then, it directly tells the on-chain contract—"I meet compliance requirements" or "I am of legal age." The contract only receives a mathematical verification result—no access to your household registration, passport, or any real personal info.

For organizations wanting to stay compliant but worried about legal risks, this is a lifesaver. It meets regulatory needs while avoiding pitfalls like GDPR privacy regulations. Users can prove they are compliant citizens without revealing private data—this is how a Web3 identity system should work, much more reliable than the current flood of KYC screenshots.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-19 01:57
Zero-knowledge proofs are definitely more appealing; it's much better than handing over your passport to an unknown small project.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTradervip
· 01-19 01:09
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed a solid system, much stronger than those small protocols that often require your passport.
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJackvip
· 01-16 06:52
honestly, zk proofs for identity *sounds* good on paper but let's be real—most projects implementing this will still find ways to rug you. show me the formal verification or it didn't happen, ser.
Reply0
GasWhisperervip
· 01-16 02:54
zero-knowledge proofs hitting different when you realize kyc screenshots are just identity timebombs waiting to detonate... the separation thesis is elegant though, ngl. mempool of trust, finally.
Reply0
GasGoblinvip
· 01-16 02:51
Zero-knowledge proofs, I've seen this trick before, but finally someone is taking it seriously When GAS fees skyrocketed, I cursed, but what really scared me was sending my ID to some random small project... This time, there's finally a somewhat feasible plan Self-sovereign identity, to put it simply, means data stays in your hands. No matter how powerful hackers are, there's nowhere to steal from. Love it Meeting compliance without being screwed by GDPR, it's truly a savior for institutions Now KYC screenshots are everywhere, that system really needs to be changed. Zero-knowledge proof models are the right way It would be great if this could be truly implemented, instead of just another PPT project
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 01-16 02:43
Wait a minute, is this SSI solution really that perfect? How do on-chain contracts verify the authenticity of zero-knowledge proofs? I'm worried it might just be another excuse to scam users.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirstvip
· 01-16 02:39
Wow, this is the real solution. Once zero-knowledge proofs are out, no one can compete.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42vip
· 01-16 02:38
The idea of zero-knowledge proofs is indeed brilliant, much more reliable than projects that constantly ask you to selfie.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStackervip
· 01-16 02:38
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly amazing; finally, someone has made KYC less disgusting.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 01-16 02:29
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed elegant, with complete isolation of data flow and the asymmetry of information between counterparties being directly eliminated... etc. In this case, wouldn't the verification cost of on-chain contracts become a new arbitrage opportunity?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin