There's always been an interesting question—why do Chinese Meme coins never really grow big?



Many say it's because the whales are too gentle, and the narrative isn't fresh enough. Actually, that's not true. The real issue is that most people never truly consider trusting a project from start to finish.

The mainstream approach to Chinese Meme is basically a relay of information—coming in and asking which layer you're on, and whether there's a next person to pass the baton to. No one cares what the coin itself is, nor do they discuss whether they genuinely identify with the symbol. The entire market logic is: liking a certain Meme is seen as childish, and faith is directly viewed as a risk exposure.

What happens then? Each wave of dissemination self-destructs, emotions are compressed, cycles are accelerated, and trust is settled prematurely. Without genuine faith backing, the ceiling for such projects naturally can't be raised.

But Bull and Bear projects are different. Their survival isn't because "they can still rise," but because some people genuinely identify with the symbol, are willing to stay and contribute to building, and are willing to continue investing even without certainty. They rely on emotions, time, and sustained actions to add value, rather than information advantages to prolong life.

Ultimately, the fundamental reason for the low ceiling of Chinese Meme coins isn't market issues, but that most projects have defaulted from the start—people will run, and trust isn't worth much to begin with. Bull and Bear projects are completely the opposite. When a Meme is truly trusted, who knows how far it can go.
MEME0,32%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DegenGamblervip
· 01-18 18:30
Faith is a nice thing to talk about, but ultimately someone has to take the risk. I don't quite agree with the "bull and bear" approach; at the end of the day, it's just good luck to have caught the right timing.
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoadvip
· 01-17 00:07
This analysis is thorough. It's just that the fundamental difference between faith and chain-guessing. The "bull and horse" approach has indeed found a way to play it well.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithAPlanvip
· 01-16 02:48
Exactly right, the Chinese community is like this—it's all about information asymmetry games. Who the hell actually believes it?
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictimvip
· 01-16 02:47
Exactly right, the Chinese community is like this, full of information brokers, no one truly trusts.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 01-16 02:45
Exactly right, this is a common problem in the Chinese crypto community—everyone is just trying to find the next bagholder, no one truly believes.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin