Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Do you remember this?
Interestingly, an image appeared in Ribbit Capital's internal report "Ribbit Pulse Q2"—the image originally came from an article about $TIBBIR. Later, the report was made public, and everyone can verify it themselves by turning to page 12.
This raises an interesting discussion: how are internal document citation policies managed by large institutions? The flow and ownership of information between media and research institutions deserve in-depth consideration. The Web3 community has always emphasized transparency—shouldn't situations like this be handled more openly?
This tune of transparency is really loud, then they turn around and start screenshotting each other, hilarious.
Ribbit's move is really not very decent.
Why does it feel like Web3 rules are no different from traditional finance?
I looked through it again, and sure enough, the images don't even have sources marked?
If everyone plays like this, what can we believe in?
This is what they call building transparency, interesting.
---
Reposting without attribution is indeed a bit ironic in Web3, where transparency is preached every day
---
Ribbit's move is really outrageous; if it were small retail investors, they would have been suspended long ago
---
So, did they forget to attribute or was it intentional? I'm curious about how they explain it internally
---
Is this the difference between institutions and retail investors... images can be used like this?
---
Laughing to death, the community that emphasizes transparency is actually so opaque itself, incredible
Is this what Web3 calls transparency? In the end, everyone is just doing their own thing.
Ribbit's recent move is a bit outrageous, but honestly, this kind of thing happens all the time in the industry.
I'm really speechless. They don't even know how to cite references, yet they still have the nerve to publish reports.
Speechless... Just copy and paste, at least they made it public, while some hide and dodge.
If this were a small project in the crypto space, it would have been torn apart long ago. Why do big institutions get away with it?
Ribbit's approach is a bit hard to sustain, even in Web3 they’re still doing this.
Really, the data sources for these VCs have always been a mystery, and then they turn around and call it their insights.
You can see it just by flipping to page 12? That's bold... The industry’s so-called "reference" rules need to be changed.
Is it really so hard to cite a source, or is it intentional?
Talking about transparency for so long, but they’re the least transparent themselves, hilarious.