Web3 is actually repeating the development trajectory of Web2.



Do you remember what the internet looked like in the beginning? Slow page loads, few images, rough content. The root cause was simple—storage and bandwidth were prohibitively expensive.

It wasn't until cloud storage and CDN technology matured that internet content truly exploded.

In the context of Web3, the role played by decentralized storage protocols is actually quite clear: they are the "cloud storage + data distribution infrastructure" within a distributed network.

But this time, there is a fundamental difference. No centralized giants monopolize the space; instead, it is a verifiable, censorship-resistant, permissionless network architecture.

When history begins to repeat itself, it is often only a few people who can see the value before the story is fully told.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GateUser-c799715cvip
· 01-18 18:36
Haha, I agree with this logic, but the key is that someone actually needs to use it in practice.

---

Does putting that cloud storage system into Web3 automatically decentralize it? Feels not that simple.

---

Wait, is this implying that only a few people are entering now? Am I late to buy?

---

Repetition of the track is one thing, but the real gamble is whether it can defeat the giants' monopoly.

---

It sounds good, but I don't know when we can use lag-free applications.

---

Decentralized storage has been hyped up, but what about usability? User experience? That's the real bottleneck.

---

Before the story is finished, see the value clearly. Can those who see it clearly now make money?

---

That's right, but Web2 took so long to mature. How long will Web3 have to wait?

---

This idea is a bit too optimistic; giants won't willingly give up their market share.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesisvip
· 01-16 18:37
On-chain data shows that storage costs are indeed a key bottleneck, but this analogy overlooks one point — Web2 is driven by centralized benefits with exponential growth, while Web3 relies on incentive mechanisms to operate autonomously. Can their trajectories be the same?
View OriginalReply0
TooScaredToSellvip
· 01-16 01:57
The repeated talk about history repeating itself has become tiresome, but to be honest... can decentralized storage really surpass cloud storage giants?

I wasn't really around during the early days of the internet, but looking at projects like IPFS now, they still seem to be moving too slowly.

But on the other hand, if they can really pull it off, it would definitely be valuable.

This kind of rhetoric always attracts a wave of people, but the difficulty in execution... well, it depends on who can first make the user experience smooth.

Early entrants indeed have an advantage in seeing the potential clearly, but the problem is that we, the retail investors, simply can't judge who will succeed.

That's why I can't hold on tightly; after some twists and turns, I've decided to adopt a long-term watch approach.

I'm optimistic, but who can bear the risks?
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfervip
· 01-16 01:54
Ha, it's that same "history repeating" argument again. But this time, it's a bit more interesting—whether decentralized storage can really take down cloud giants is still up in the air.

Speaking of which, instead of waiting for "a few people" to see the value, why not go all in now? After all, we've already lost money.

This logic sounds like an endorsement of certain projects, so be cautious.

Details are the devil, no matter how awesome the storage protocol is, if user experience can't keep up, it's all pointless.

That's true, but the premise is that these "permissionless" networks can really survive the next bear market.

Web2 spent a lot of money back then to shape the current landscape. Is the funding for Web3 enough?
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmivip
· 01-16 01:43
Everyone talks about history repeating itself, but can we really escape the claws of the giants this time? I remain skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFundvip
· 01-16 01:40
This logic sounds good, but I still think that most current Web3 projects are just hype stories, and there are very few infrastructure projects that can truly take off.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanistervip
· 01-16 01:38
Buddy, this analogy is a bit of a stretch... The real bottleneck isn't the storage protocol at all.

It sounds nice, but right now everyone using IPFS is complaining about speed—what decentralization are we even talking about?

The early internet was bad because of technical limitations, and Web3 is bad because nobody's actually using it.

So... what should we buy now?

But then again, someone has to see the potential first, just worried that everyone else is just a bunch of rookies.

I'm tired of hearing the same rhetoric about history repeating itself.

By the time the explosion happens, it won't look anything like it does now.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin