Many people have paid attention to various activity incentives, but the true value logic is often overlooked. As an observer who has been immersed in this circle for many years, I want to seriously discuss today why projects like Dusk, which have been "long-standing," are experiencing an explosion this year.



**Track Shift: From Performance Competition to Compliance Competition**

The current market is no longer lacking high TPS public chains. What is truly scarce? It is infrastructure that can reassure traditional financial institutions, banks, and funds to participate. Institutions have two core demands: privacy protection and regulatory transparency. Previous solutions are either fully open (no privacy) or operate as black boxes (no compliance), making it difficult to achieve both.

Dusk's approach is different—it embeds the European MiCA compliance standards at the protocol level, which is equivalent to obtaining an "entry permit" in the wave of RWA on-chain.

**Underlying Innovation: Balancing Privacy and Auditability**

When mentioning Dusk, many people think only of zero-knowledge proofs, but its real killer feature is its self-developed Plonk proof system and Citadel identity protocol. This set of technologies achieves a breakthrough: users can prove the legality of their funds' source to regulators while hiding account balances and transaction counterparts.

This "auditable privacy" just fills the most urgent technical gap in the RWA track and is also a prerequisite for large-scale deployment of institutional-grade applications.
DUSK3,62%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BTCRetirementFundvip
· 01-18 09:57
The true value lies in compliance rather than hype, and that's correct. However, whether Dusk can truly be adopted by institutions depends on market response; having only a technical framework is useless.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugsvip
· 01-16 01:55
To be honest, compliance has indeed been seriously underestimated. Everyone is hyping TPS and performance, but no one realizes that the actual needs of institutions are not in this area.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeOnChainvip
· 01-16 01:51
Well, finally someone has explained this clearly. The group of people who kept shouting TPS and performance every day actually didn't get to the point. Dusk has indeed addressed the core pain points of institutions—privacy and compliance simultaneously—this is the real necessity.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlockvip
· 01-16 01:49
actually... the "auditable privacy" framing here is doing some heavy lifting that most people aren't interrogating closely enough. Plonk's elegant mathematically, sure, but let's be honest about what this really solves—it's not magically squaring the circle between user privacy and regulatory surveillance, it's just making the tradeoff *feel* less painful through cryptographic theater.
Reply0
WhaleSurfervip
· 01-16 01:37
Wow, finally someone has understood this thoroughly. Most people are still focused on incentivized running, unaware that the racecourse has already changed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin