InfoFi's cleanup of AI-generated accounts was a solid move—definitely needed that sweep to keep the platform clean. But here's the catch: the monetization structure still needs work. Without better incentive alignment, you'll just see the same farming operations and bot activity return under different names. The real challenge is building a tokenomics model that rewards genuine participation over automated noise. That's where the meaningful community signal lives.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlatTax
· 21h ago
Cleaning up bot accounts can't be blown out of proportion; the key still depends on how the incentive mechanism is designed. Otherwise, it's like pressing the gourd and it pops up elsewhere.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-16 21:45
NGL, cleaning up bot accounts is just a temporary fix; the key is to get the incentive model right. Otherwise, farmers can just change their disguises and come back to play.
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 01-16 02:26
Cleaning up AI accounts is the right move, but it's just treating the symptoms... The real issue lies in tokenomics design, otherwise the scam team will just rebrand and come back again.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 01-16 01:03
The cleanup mechanism indeed scores points, but the real test is still to come... Before the incentive model is sorted out, these farm accounts will just switch disguises again. Is it interesting?
View OriginalReply0
GasSavingMaster
· 01-16 00:57
Cleaning up robot accounts is a good move, but the real test is yet to come... Just cleaning up isn't enough; the incentive mechanism must keep up, or else someone will just come back with a different disguise.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-16 00:45
Cleaning up bot accounts is indeed necessary, but it's only a temporary fix... If the incentive mechanism can't keep up, they'll just come back under a different guise.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 01-16 00:44
Cleaning up AI accounts is indeed necessary, but the core issue still lies in the poor design of the incentive mechanism... Without solving this, changing the farm account's disguise and coming back is just a temporary fix. What truly matters is that tokenomics can distinguish between real users and noise—that's the key.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrape
· 01-16 00:40
Oh no, I wish I had changed the tokenomics earlier. Now clearing accounts is just for fun...
InfoFi's cleanup of AI-generated accounts was a solid move—definitely needed that sweep to keep the platform clean. But here's the catch: the monetization structure still needs work. Without better incentive alignment, you'll just see the same farming operations and bot activity return under different names. The real challenge is building a tokenomics model that rewards genuine participation over automated noise. That's where the meaningful community signal lives.