Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
What score can be given regarding the prediction of institutional entry?
A well-known financial institution recently released a compelling outlook on the crypto market. They believe that after the record-breaking 2025, the momentum of cryptocurrency capital inflows may not only continue but could even accelerate—an estimated $130 billion in new funds is expected to enter.
What is the logic behind this judgment? There are mainly two supporting points. First, the US cryptocurrency regulatory framework is becoming clearer, giving institutional investors more confidence. Second, the recognition of crypto assets as a mainstream asset class is continuously increasing. Based on these two points, the institution predicts a significant increase in institutional participation in 2026.
Interestingly, the main source of this capital influx is not mysterious. Most of the capital flow in 2025 comes from BTC and ETH spot ETFs, driven primarily by individual investors on Wall Street. Looking at specific data, over half of the cash flow comes from digital asset trust products, with strategic funds alone contributing about $23 billion.
However, there is a noteworthy change—CME's Bitcoin and Ethereum futures trading activity is expected to decline. The reason behind this is quite straightforward: some institutions have found they no longer need to invest in cryptocurrencies through CME futures. They are shifting to more efficient, cost-effective methods, such as directly holding Bitcoin ETFs or listed trading companies. Nowadays, CME futures are mainly used for hedging purposes rather than building positions.
But it’s worth taking a calm view—although the regulatory environment has indeed improved significantly, the flow of venture capital into cryptocurrencies still appears somewhat sluggish, and there is still a considerable gap compared to the peak of the previous cycle.
---
I believe the decline in CME futures activity, after all, buying ETFs directly is more comfortable. Why make it so complicated? But what does this indicate? It shows that institutional strategies are changing, not accelerating their entry.
---
$23 billion strategic fund sounds impressive, but venture capital is still weak. Isn't that contradictory? It feels like big institutions are grabbing the cake, while small projects are ignored.
---
If I were to rate this prediction, 7 out of 10 at most. There are too many assumptions involved.
---
A clear regulatory framework is true, but $130 billion in new funds? I think most are still existing funds arbitraging; don't be fooled by the hype.
---
It reminds me a bit of those predictions from last year. What happened later? Doesn't everyone have a clear idea? This time, it's just a change of numbers.
Give it a 6 out of 10. Regulation is indeed improving, but there hasn't been any movement in the VC space, which is a bit awkward.
The story about ETF siphoning off CME futures is indeed happening, but will institutions really be that obedient to come in? I still want to see actual data to speak.
130 billion sounds like a story, but is it really coming?
Predictions are always nice, but anyway, those who make money are never just following the trend of these predictions. Thinking for yourself is more important.
Regulation becoming clearer is true, but playing with crypto is all about emotions; numbers are just clouds.
---
Basically, ETFs are attracting funds, while futures are being neglected. Why are institutions "significantly increasing" again?
---
Will they dare to enter once regulations are clear? The folks on Wall Street aren't that naive, right?
---
Venture capital is still sluggish. Why would other institutions flood in crazily?
---
230 billion strategic fund sounds like a lot, but is it really enough to watch?
---
Predictions, predictions. Every year there's a new trick. I've believed it a few times, and it turns out to be true.
---
The vampire ETF mode is activated, and the decline in futures trading volume is the real signal.
---
Clear regulation is a good thing, but the weak VC liquidity indicates that institutions are still on the sidelines.
---
Once again, it's Wall Street retail investors pushing, but what about the big institutions?
---
CME futures are shifting to hedging, in other words, they don't want to take risks anymore.
---
Significant growth of institutions by 2026? I think it's more about acceleration of segmentation.
---
230 billion strategic fund sounds large, but spread across the entire market, it's just a small amount.
---
Spot ETF is just a disguised way of cutting leeks; don't be fooled by these numbers.
---
Crypto venture capital is weak while institutions are entering; isn't that contradictory?
---
Wow, they're starting to tell stories again, just like they did last year.