No beef with the earlier post about paid partnerships—that was properly disclosed. But it does give me a chance to call out something that's been bugging me: this widespread belief that it'll reshape the timeline? That's just not grounded in reality. Everyone seems to have bought into this narrative without really thinking it through. The logic just doesn't hold up when you actually examine it.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
FlashLoanPrincevip
· 01-19 00:05
To be honest, I've wanted to criticize this "reconstruction timeline" narrative for a long time. It's just a bunch of people blindly following the trend and making reckless purchases, which can't withstand scrutiny.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTopvip
· 01-18 02:10
Honestly, this argument is really absurd. A bunch of people are jumping on the bandwagon and shouting "changing the timeline." Wake up, everyone. Think carefully—it's fundamentally unsubstantiated.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiEscapeArtistvip
· 01-16 00:51
Forget it, this statement is too absurd and completely untenable.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaservip
· 01-16 00:47
Basically, it's just collective delusion; no one really thinks about what can actually be changed.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_againvip
· 01-16 00:45
Haha, I'm tired of this rhetoric. Is it really just collective hallucination?
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerkervip
· 01-16 00:43
Do you really believe in this "changing the timeline" story? I don't see any solid basis for it. Did you just follow the trend and accept it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin